From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 87179 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2019 11:37:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 82286 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jan 2019 11:36:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*i:sk:12c2c54, H*f:sk:12c2c54, sirl, Sirl X-HELO: mail-wm1-f42.google.com Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com (HELO mail-wm1-f42.google.com) (209.85.128.42) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:36:29 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-f42.google.com with SMTP id n190so1665509wmd.0; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 03:36:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oeULzwczsBKSViLWR8/FMZgX7NX9Ye60ZZRLbOPvg+g=; b=IusQT3ss4UrdG1+jUlaq+ZBI0foygPGYU1TYFD0HY3Dp2CcE3Tf4UKp3bkE2Cr6htY 6ClsUM9Y336aPgHxOSwvqylXGkAfA6/UdBJ1MmTXKpPc9ahRfB2t+EwtOHHl3dHRoQ7h wg79ZNfSnvcgf1jvwRuCzfTpH1jpMKuKQZmDrYn0bxANLgsYweGW2SDXkV2kuSZt/+W+ Uu9+JxLJO3ejjRhqYiCsczg4LDubzwh7Si6iJnzl99jl78fYZ8SicfbPAMSSZ5hcg3Rd ScV5PkVdzuSeh+EH19OttszEe/QnlOueysjkQ4vGTQbDAJIdm8Xmk+Oa1W8NuPFk7xkP IM9w== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <80e1821d-b6da-c6b6-2bf2-29734f5fd34e@netcologne.de> <12c2c542-28a0-df4a-48a6-ac3a83001d34@lauterbach.com> In-Reply-To: <12c2c542-28a0-df4a-48a6-ac3a83001d34@lauterbach.com> From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC] -Weverything To: Franz Sirl Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" , Thomas Koenig , "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg00191.txt.bz2 On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 11:21, Franz Sirl wrote: > The LLVM devs may hate it, but as maintainer of a multi-platform > multi-compiler automated build framework I _love_ -Weverything. It's > much easier to handle a compiler upgrade this way without missing any > new warnings not enabled by -Wall -Wextra. When there are new warnings that aren't enabled by -Wall -Wextra, there's probably a reason they aren't enabled by default. "Gotta catch 'em all" is for Pokemon, not compiler warnings ;-)