From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com (mail-wr1-x429.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::429])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E2A0385702E
 for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 13:51:16 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 8E2A0385702E
Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id a4so19974307wrr.2
 for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 06:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=nhQNblTu16r0uD9b26srsM6KdodcfxfYwr4uNP5QdXQ=;
 b=dCDoOXZGE5Xyr1OcmDsOUldchMynGJj8J01xZUgysTTxmQJAz8XTuvqHE9qReNJCbL
 POAcIgYuQYPDzi2Sh+y6sdrybp93FiaxQdJLftOA5OGbYrKSYIiPBdP0f3OvWw0RNZw2
 938X4W/Y+lpupalfRtyRpvEAFh9CokNDOQh7xdbfHX2QNcoK7rCOadFmcudRIZ/gnOwO
 J+3MpddFhh5dvtiSPNpZPN0cBbsYHrpwNqpDRlUwwCZQmVan2Q6oWSx5jNKTmNcUZWL9
 BUR8XFMOMKOdSh2NTlHmurYhvFEe5oJHhz/zptx/AenzwKNO6vr4NlajbYLDFXmjv8Aj
 S4zA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532blKDY8VUhnPo6IsNbfOYNwXYFBIT8qewFTQhyTSzGDml15DqD
 K9I4fVAxDjUHNIRZ9zRr7/av11eXF8E8tLA205M=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzCbZTysqxHTdo1gpWXucB0Zrkhd+oam4Tw50vjLBS36sf8KSWmXVcjZ6J+rBI1n31GtUzTK9yQtbTix5w8Ato=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:f186:: with SMTP id h6mr25643234wro.89.1618408275688; 
 Wed, 14 Apr 2021 06:51:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALTpEH7Q-hEZzN=SDOJJxSV2=4e3Gx8ihvpseaApdNZW5CS9-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAH6eHdTEsbHjds7-0TSZPL8kgBO3Hyn0eMJKJ6dtm6drsjdzQA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4253b2d8ce5e70d1ba8183723753720e1cff3818.camel@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4253b2d8ce5e70d1ba8183723753720e1cff3818.camel@redhat.com>
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:51:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdTFn-tRV2doqh2RWqwiv=d4+FWtsrK9FGLU4mx52FdozQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: On rms controversy
To: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
Cc: pawel.kunio@gmail.com, "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc mailing list <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 13:51:18 -0000

On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 13:38, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 08:01 +0100, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Apr 2021, 07:50 pawel k. via Gcc, <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> >
>
> [...snip...]
>
> > Very logical argument, thanks for sharing.
>
> Jonathan, it's clear to me that you're being sarcastic, but it might
> not be clear to others.  Please avoid sarcasm - it amplifies
> misunderstanding on the internet, and it seems to me that that's
> counterproductive when discussing a sensitive topic.

For the avoidance of doubt, I was being sarcastic. I didn't think it
was a logical argument, I thought it was one of the worst so far in
this whole clownshow.

> I disagree with much of what Pawel wrote, but this discussion has left
> me feeling drained.  I don't have the mental energy to do a point-by-
> point response, and I don't think it would be a productive thing to
> post to this mailing list.

Which is why I went for sarcasm instead.