From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
To: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
Cc: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludovic.courtes@inria.fr>,
"Richard Guenther" <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
"Ian Lance Taylor" <iant@google.com>,
"Andrew Pinski" <pinskia@gmail.com>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GCC 5? (was Re: GCC 4.7.0RC: Mangled names in cc1)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdTU3cmZJCNLHT7mP7NHAg__BtEEZ_QVF0LrFe9zRVvzCw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1331918370.2174.50.camel@surprise>
On 16 March 2012 17:19, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> What I'm really hoping for from GCC is a move towards a collection of
> libraries that can be embedded in (license-compatible) apps: LLVM is
> gaining ground for the use case of programs that need JIT-compilation
> (e.g. the X server, or a JVM). I appreciate that JIT compilation has
> different characteristics to a classic ahead-of-time compiler.
>
> C++ is likely to make it more difficult to embed GCC into such apps
It seems to work for LLVM and Clang.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-16 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-09 9:51 GCC 4.7.0RC: Mangled names in cc1 Ludovic Courtès
2012-03-09 9:54 ` Andrew Pinski
2012-03-09 10:00 ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-03-09 10:41 ` Ludovic Courtès
2012-03-09 13:26 ` Ludovic Courtès
2012-03-09 14:17 ` Duncan Sands
2012-03-09 14:57 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2012-03-09 15:42 ` Ludovic Courtès
2012-03-09 16:01 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2012-03-09 17:00 ` Ludovic Courtès
2012-03-09 18:08 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2012-03-12 8:56 ` Ludovic Courtès
2012-03-12 12:11 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-12 12:31 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-03-16 11:04 ` Ludovic Courtès
2012-03-16 11:05 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-16 13:04 ` Ludovic Courtès
2012-03-16 13:08 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-16 15:17 ` Ludovic Courtès
2012-03-16 18:48 ` GCC 5? (was Re: GCC 4.7.0RC: Mangled names in cc1) David Malcolm
2012-03-16 19:03 ` Diego Novillo
2012-03-16 19:29 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-03-16 19:42 ` Joseph S. Myers
2012-03-18 16:56 ` GCC 5 & modularity Basile Starynkevitch
2012-03-18 17:11 ` Robert Dewar
2012-03-18 17:53 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2012-03-18 20:49 ` Jonathan Wakely
2012-03-19 5:57 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2012-03-19 10:04 ` Jonathan Wakely
2012-03-19 10:57 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-03-16 20:22 ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]
2012-03-19 10:08 ` GCC 5? (was Re: GCC 4.7.0RC: Mangled names in cc1) Richard Guenther
2012-03-19 15:37 ` Ludovic Courtès
2012-03-19 15:58 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-20 11:47 ` Ludovic Courtès
2012-03-20 12:07 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-19 18:04 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-03-16 13:24 ` GCC 4.7.0RC: Mangled names in cc1 Basile Starynkevitch
2012-03-16 17:40 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-03-19 9:57 ` Ludovic Courtès
2012-03-19 10:54 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-03-19 15:46 ` Ludovic Courtès
2012-03-16 17:35 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-03-12 12:30 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2012-03-10 1:25 ` David Malcolm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAH6eHdTU3cmZJCNLHT7mP7NHAg__BtEEZ_QVF0LrFe9zRVvzCw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jwakely.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=dmalcolm@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=iant@google.com \
--cc=ludovic.courtes@inria.fr \
--cc=pinskia@gmail.com \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).