From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ej1-x629.google.com (mail-ej1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::629]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43F673858D35 for ; Tue, 23 May 2023 17:48:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 43F673858D35 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-ej1-x629.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-96f818c48fbso868045266b.0 for ; Tue, 23 May 2023 10:48:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1684864087; x=1687456087; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WtE/NZjFJppRQzipTFKTsjmySN5HKZV5B/Jmap1YGFc=; b=lboP2KRYTUiisJY6E/nREeUlIcMfsvZUcpdRWN9u1D2qIT/omiJv7n7F3ulYUavOi4 o0mOVGae7VY/02xnTKklvdvtP3HKtz0v/AE5D89Vw7oPCvGlkWDTkE6xxZXZQzB8XVlf 5KpEI9jYcRE8eUvE0KZ8jYIfTAd/MNCErgrVALXhcfrwYPs2iWJxZFhfEQCk7ifNtEOe MbntBW0OTTPUiEUakmCCfOPB5a8o1HfD6B7L+nHja2OrEny5M/FKYaSL3syB8QwSSR6n lU9sj17F/wvpJg36NgRqcFtAnU594VxPTL61XlF4Qtv9P9PRytvCDV5mHRd94w8KICl1 HDtw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1684864087; x=1687456087; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=WtE/NZjFJppRQzipTFKTsjmySN5HKZV5B/Jmap1YGFc=; b=g1lzXVaPW+zuG17TB6Q4YCJjOp+kdcpSSl8SNgLaamamLEym03P+VeYswIi9AgC+q2 wFbtW4yfOjKEVzvLupjrADiwNeI2HG/SM44bIWLw5BQMk+SEiCaIXkDWqCBLxalo3luT XYuSNjku40pIwwgcoqluaKiIn+BoKErbB6LmyK/xAXuJIw3J/+11D2qK5nZE+CB6Rm7s /U/aZEElKkXpvEDnYgiXu9RXpiLqZUIM/7l+G4LpNpPaMIA52f3Baha4tV1uCvJ/niFx P00CDuatTEvkT9e3j+fzjqoIdrZpsaWLDRt1+e95ND9p133JL91xCLV6+Y8MShLazJrB 4Vug== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwiXAqc/8dgpPD5GIOghJKUTqm+XwwaA6Ll7bTd6ATM3lSYJNOr oSfG+Bd88xzGRbZnDiAtdjBi9roHLShOhpQQBZs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4Bwruk4bfS0ttBTzBwxkQYxaGFjLAbLMECF3zcF6ysbu5araMbgQQ9enSChh5j0eBPI6G2maAbWWMxZa3azmY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:75e6:b0:965:d17b:292 with SMTP id jz6-20020a17090775e600b00965d17b0292mr14654254ejc.60.1684864087153; Tue, 23 May 2023 10:48:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2e8a8750bb4b44a535a9df669183f6fa@disroot.org> In-Reply-To: <2e8a8750bb4b44a535a9df669183f6fa@disroot.org> From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 18:47:56 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Differences between clang and gcc handling of int[static n] function arguments To: peter0x44 Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000068dedd05fc5ffdd8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: --00000000000068dedd05fc5ffdd8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, 22 May 2023, 00:40 peter0x44 via Gcc, wrote: > > I would be happy to open a PR to improve this warning, if there isn't > one already. > Please do. > > It seems it might even be trivial enough for me to investigate and > tackle myself, in some spare time. > > I see very little code using either of these features, so it's > definitely not a high priority task regardless. > Glibc uses the nonnull attribute in many places. Libstdc++ uses it in a few places. --00000000000068dedd05fc5ffdd8--