From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 101677 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2019 07:30:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 101554 invoked by uid 89); 10 Sep 2019 07:30:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=answered, our X-HELO: mail-wr1-f46.google.com Received: from mail-wr1-f46.google.com (HELO mail-wr1-f46.google.com) (209.85.221.46) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 07:30:28 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-f46.google.com with SMTP id q14so17900770wrm.9 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 00:30:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Qaf0KKsbrQ0Iz0oq+i0lRFHZUa6ULIE78DENZyFfIoA=; b=XD1fdy/MHe5Yi+lMvsES3VB5+eWzwSHukt7lxbngKW2J5nwDtkxTCTsZbCbkl77Gx/ A7B2aDpI7QpRbXofF/5dRg4YJK9xDbQ9QFmIHYk1CDpqYn5EpuI4Xx16OtvsjUohtdtB s8FpPZoWWm5DdRee/SCSAS9YzecbKDRp0pwNjO3v2dUwN9rnEgbNG8+XkD8DqU8ajCpu JkhnKuNofwfxY7SlHDAZJahWm+19h9IK6Ev2r3O0t5Ru3EHIjvsCPkG5LtKHdmfxn/aA bzE4BNUubUi8zonOF9VsXP+Xwe9gvqwbCdyx/l7rBDhvYi/yGAMCdShSqf/vH23TRUpL Qehw== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1628343437.3955703.1568099142817.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1628343437.3955703.1568099142817@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1628343437.3955703.1568099142817@mail.yahoo.com> From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 07:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: gcc-ver 7.3 support To: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00067.txt.bz2 Answered on gcc-help. On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 at 08:07, Krishnakant Mehta via gcc-help wrote: > > > Hi, > > We are using gcc compiler toolchain for one of our > > =E2=80=98Red hat Enterprise Linux 8 =E2=80=99 based software developmentp= roject > > We would like know whether gcc- series 7 isstill in support from forum? > > {gcc version 7.3 in particular, is it still supported by forum ?} > which are actively supported gcc compiler toolchain versions? > > Thanks & Regards, > > Krishnakant Mehta > > Capgemini-India. >