From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-174067-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12311 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2012 22:11:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 12279 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2012 22:11:08 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-lb0-f175.google.com) (209.85.217.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 22:10:46 +0000
Received: by lbjn8 with SMTP id n8so4544334lbj.20        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=google.com; s=20120113;        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to         :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state;        bh=nFeMvSqA/ojFunbE/CwszppF6Rm+WitL6V38KKO4hkE=;        b=MbRbhShOTX9hY1Jh4ixpWzKe8f28p0miAYC4xnEmA8Ib1/eCyDvQSBJLCzh+BlSzeh         d9QKhhP5LYV5Pv78hreyWGuCA4unTSzDC3+91QIWgaet/FQblv2NJDxyiCo+7pi0kk/t         ZPnudIrBnuF5q6QfH1+PDlwg8uC1hF24qDc01yxsggK3RrNe7IVF3nk8HU8oytlDc4Vr         UN3NqDSxVk9htmn9iVPQOOl+rsHzMwCtxpQW11QnE3ybgwNTpnZReIpbQ5G1nNnc2gB6         wTZN+dAxhjNGWCtifJ81Q3rZgHdA+xO1btFIEIpJf63p+zURjBbNSjgV5iBwtCF9BRBK         cbiw==
Received: by 10.112.86.231 with SMTP id s7mr3679420lbz.11.1334959844678;        Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.86.231 with SMTP id s7mr3679403lbz.11.1334959844508; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.22.68 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOpNqs933DZejuBV4tjcyLnc29Z3302vkj5LN1Y23Pnzmg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMe9rOqGmiGyp42inUb9O8cH3Ga+PNSjHLAQcEfeTXs1RcM0qg@mail.gmail.com>	<20120420165552.q36l2rh45cwwsokw-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net>	<CAMe9rOpNqs933DZejuBV4tjcyLnc29Z3302vkj5LN1Y23Pnzmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 22:11:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAHACq4qr7tuhLAD6vwNFh8W_ib3HYa6ynppJiyd4r=zaETWvXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: Add STB_GNU_SECONDARY
From: Cary Coutant <ccoutant@google.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: Joern Rennecke <amylaar@spamcop.net>, "Ansari, Zia" <zia.ansari@intel.com>, 	GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>, 	Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQno5BQ23DB959FBWgbOtff0OFKOIMi/K/TPRRmtIqXwwZMyuCun3iQfisp4dl1hNObOYDD5qTLo8FPAUQy+wdXHVV3nHh65OUYy62omcARK6tRSLQ1LOCVzub8pKvg2vYkFDPNI
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00744.txt.bz2

> We only have very few bits to in STB_XXX field.

This is exactly why I'm not in favor of this extension. The feature
doesn't seem compelling enough to use up one of these precious
reserved values (in fact, you're using the next-to-last one that's
reserved for OS use).

You want a backup definition? Put a weak def at the end of the link line.

-cary