From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 42964 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2018 18:16:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 42949 invoked by uid 89); 6 Mar 2018 18:16:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*f:sk:280e999, H*i:sk:280e999 X-HELO: mail-io0-f170.google.com Received: from mail-io0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-io0-f170.google.com) (209.85.223.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 18:16:57 +0000 Received: by mail-io0-f170.google.com with SMTP id d71so23082250iog.4 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 10:16:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AU/0KoAUtguG/ny1p1b7/g2bkh1C3TitOYCC07zGcTc=; b=WWUAhxvs1xXKU7FCo/ufdpysgW3CloDGKRD3yJyVl6ycqJ5Mc06QNxb8mrgy758e6o k1x7hzUHUEmkFYe8rd0CsVqXM/IkkMIuhrj3wfrDYP4UyrSUxUZjykoQjQ3NKWzJ8bMM ECIcTXTct8sU03BbvfQ8mujzs2ZvZhFj4v7ueGeyfg49RoFo+Yq31ku46fvo2sfvjne/ 8cWafr8K4P1W8OCUUcRDx0iTw8xroF2Tc6rOPjRC2uxgdl/cn3DNdQpAxwOX9D9WhCiX I8tcJbXXbib9algH7HJ9RCcFacQhRkquuTC9do4wvDcsRgGrXk7hacFGyeE/tG0K53ap FtQA== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPCttNWRTnyfizOpZBIe93gar2PJLS8j1549omwFziij2RJcktKa DKwlQhAAelXvSalBaPaydG3lxoksY1DoC5PpySQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELu0uAO9l7sQUCKk5zrI1nRdOW2eYXbt6Cn+CNJJ7Gh4A4oiKFzx1thTxX0LiCPV7VyttuWTmIBmA1ari/aMbqA= X-Received: by 10.107.30.70 with SMTP id e67mr21917328ioe.57.1520360215510; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 10:16:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.2.105.200 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Mar 2018 10:16:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <280e999f-92ec-e27b-4d47-56e2c4abdcbb@suse.cz> References: <6f547f38-1751-c003-b5ae-52dae776d39a@suse.cz> <280e999f-92ec-e27b-4d47-56e2c4abdcbb@suse.cz> From: "Bin.Cheng" Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 18:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How big (and fast) is going to be GCC 8? [part 2] To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=C5=A1ka?= Cc: GCC Development , Jan Hubicka , Richard Biener , Michael Matz , Martin Jambor Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-03/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2 On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Martin Li=C5=A1ka wrote: > Hi. > > This is speed comparison of GCC 8 builds compared to my system GCC 7.3.0 > which is built with PGO bootstrap. > > I run empty C and C++ source file, tramp3d and the rest are some big beas= ts > from GCC source file. Feel free to suggest another test candidates? Note > that first column defines how many times was test run. First thanks very much for collecting the data. Since we enabled several loop passes at O3 and above levels, some data for Ofast might be interesting? Thanks, bin > > Martin