public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
	 "Uecker, Martin" <Martin.Uecker@med.uni-goettingen.de>,
	"gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
	 "amonakov@ispras.ru" <amonakov@ispras.ru>,
	"ubizjak@gmail.com" <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
	 "luto@kernel.org" <luto@kernel.org>,
	linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org,  Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: typeof and operands in named address spaces
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:13:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wh_kn11vXfi2Ns8E4F0GgmUprQtD-=RnU6Eg+N7coY5gw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201116111056.GA3121378@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 3:11 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> XXX: I've only verified the below actually compiles, I've not verified
>      the generated code is actually 'correct'.

Well, it was mainly the arm64 code generation for load-acquire and
store-release that wanted this - so it's really the generated code
that matters.

Will, can you check?

Because:

> +#define __unqual_typeof(type)  typeof( (typeof(type))type )

that's certainly a much nicer version than the existing pre-processor
expansion from hell.

             Linus

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-17 19:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-15 10:51 Uecker, Martin
2020-11-16  9:11 ` Richard Biener
2020-11-16 11:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-16 11:23     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-16 12:23     ` Uecker, Martin
2020-11-16 13:07       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-17 19:13     ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2020-11-17 19:25       ` Jakub Jelinek
2020-11-17 19:31         ` Linus Torvalds
2020-11-17 21:10           ` Will Deacon
2020-11-17 22:15             ` Will Deacon
2020-11-17 21:23           ` Uecker, Martin
2020-11-17 19:47       ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHk-=wh_kn11vXfi2Ns8E4F0GgmUprQtD-=RnU6Eg+N7coY5gw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=Martin.Uecker@med.uni-goettingen.de \
    --cc=amonakov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).