From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D01953858284 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 18:43:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org D01953858284 Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id g1so16529786edb.12 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 11:43:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ILJE9RToBOFbi4UAgFDmh2x/XbJvngvE4v2I72aj/e0=; b=nmnonbaj239zFVEsYnCEHeZzfPgukfE+Ninhx1OJZz8AIUv1BUrWVhmeNB0KVttaw1 OYeSsjBnTQkCfFAyv00//DoLw/mGBqCxlI5TlYgXXZLo47h82yIWhpmYyRgGVJ31F3kX rvmQASjxCOQ9JmdVgOFJ2CFqTfwWLsnoOefuSFO4ktLFNthU6PPNTydg77ynHZos1UWC osOGzePOzvkFlbRUrzpvQEVIJICsHXFjKTFnaQ3EDtoJa2m6BGoG/bQ8CpPxCOQE2OZX pa9FOv5xLHyG35IzEUODFEBZ7LYBYjRwGBTQBmfg1A1raIfBZrYG/J0rAIoasevG+kvp D8MA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora80dZsNk9Zrbo0s4reNnBZDD0hyaqfk6aRUCOGS9MTWlBIENxSl AyYXsRlgfHRZmgsSdVMqvtG88rWgO57NKynP0A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1uJyjVcObvk0buXaftuJigMbvH/kYS4j5LaYy5qfNvCyLIZwZzTuy30PTg2AFVfkFfV7arqVGTtls8Wq0HFj3o= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3593:b0:43a:a259:2518 with SMTP id y19-20020a056402359300b0043aa2592518mr39048551edc.117.1658169821263; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 11:43:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87wncaw9ty.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87wncaw9ty.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> From: Arthur Cohen Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 20:43:31 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: rust non-free-compatible trademark To: Florian Weimer Cc: lkcl via Gcc , lkcl X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 18:43:44 -0000 Hi Florian, On Mon, Jul 18, 2022, 20:33 Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote: > * lkcl via Gcc: > > > if the Rust Foundation were to add an extremely simple phrase > > > > "to be able to use the word rust in a distributed compiler your > > modifications must 100% pass the test suite without modifying > > the test suite" > > > > then all the problems and pain goes away. > > No. It would actually make matters worse for GCC in this case because > the stated intent is to ship without a borrow checker (=E2=80=9CThere are= no > immediate plans for a borrow checker as this is not required to compile > rust code=E2=80=9D, , retrieved 2022-07-18). The website is not up to date and we do have to change that. We do have plans for borrow-checking, which revolve around using and contributing to the Polonius project. There > are of course tests for the borrow checker in the Rust test suite, and > those that check for expected compiler errors will fail with GCC. > > Thanks, > Florian Thanks, --=20 Arthur Cohen