From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <iant@google.com>
Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49ABD38618F1
 for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:03:18 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 49ABD38618F1
Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id g8so61700225lfv.12
 for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 07:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=G2kg3+cnzJmHkXy2wDazT2NNr7LSshu7OnVDdB/6wCE=;
 b=pEDVPZP6Sj3L7+8630+pbZC3xfIoWCecx9qKdJWZygqF/MlggaOO9iQ0E+QOFm/mBQ
 nFvklxpgPDc5igGVUhOMGtt7qubIZ+P2ZZSUtyWkaTlRzc7glgqS5zTXm2jXLm63PDzg
 aZncACygAbX10khPTRVa4YT9+AJVUQM3PO6SBji443/0OYu7Mwu15uI25KxtbPPmDLpP
 B84oOsAqKCOBNnZzxQHF8W4XH9jpeTW2BGDzjDZT+chBH+4pSXmFRC7ZSojzZ+bMrkZz
 4oGqJQxRyUVzA8Pa7zrRuZiqyWvYyjELZ2kn0P4+Ifs9liZGuuIZ2oi8tXfYBdo/KC4w
 ilOQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530L0SCL+inOXJg5munLRuvMX8rL/eoS4MLSSCejr2EoayEsXYqY
 /U02kJYeByFNq3A9MbUlxTD3GhV6iHZsum3Dbo9wkg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzlbNLhmQrjbgCZ5muspk+3gEucfrjTj64RIk8nPHGdKeDbUFCTgI5aO/n1HTMMuP2a3JQoPvk3AID9Iqz1NuY=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:929:: with SMTP id
 f9mr16182819lft.153.1618927396513; 
 Tue, 20 Apr 2021 07:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2104141745340.94016@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
 <20210415134907.GA51340@thyrsus.com>
 <96db05d78cb1f829d0b3ce3026ac15a335fffd41.camel@redhat.com>
 <3e0b8d933eef3eb7f12e86bf6bc92dec6965065d.camel@silogroup.org>
 <CAKOQZ8y=tJK2qrANA_e-iEq35hu6wBONFFXUaz6YxEThmOyszw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOOE185MDNL.J37YAGWX988I@klugetown>
 <40f0e05b-3156-a649-b636-c90b8b8e0f8@pfeifer.com>
 <4A7DE074-9600-4513-A05C-566926D447BE@tesio.it>
 <535f1dcf-2258-c817-cf72-5c49dc9e5823@hesbynett.no>
 <CAKOQZ8wqh3xY0nH_pAaycdykzwNCCeoVHiZ0UgqPX_RNiMgW3g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210418131052.GB320802@thyrsus.com>
 <92c014fc39022ea03c6c801bb76ab39674e8a6fb.camel@redhat.com>
 <CAH6eHdTJwiPAweDC5bMaJd5qD5SVe0AnSHKSDFEGZNeVWckU0w@mail.gmail.com>
 <or4kg3pclk.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org> <CARASROFIMAG.3FXB91YLS7GUV@klugetown>
 <CAH6eHdRcEBWybrAUV3f5FmgZqSm4UrAX==6dKtWPmrJqbyZYAg@mail.gmail.com>
 <542eb0298a485953602e0f28f94b9f03@appliantology.com>
 <CAS8RJUDO44Z.24QC87DO4SOCA@klugetown>
 <CAH6eHdQ2DdWdhGK3M6W+zKuqE86+gQ-vG3=HcPL321yFFSPs6Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH6eHdQ2DdWdhGK3M6W+zKuqE86+gQ-vG3=HcPL321yFFSPs6Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 07:03:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKOQZ8zuHu01UG3+3yQr9jnP674GqZ5tUhcAU922wyA8gbJjKw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: removing toxic emailers
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: Frosku <frosku@frosku.com>, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_MED,
 DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,
 HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL,
 USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc mailing list <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc>,
 <mailto:gcc-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:03:29 -0000

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021, 12:54 AM Jonathan Wakely via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
wrote:

>
> Check the git logs, Google employees are minor contributors these
> days. The GPLv3 scared Google away from GCC years ago.
>

Just for the record, Google has no problem with the GPLv3.  Google stopped
working on GCC because they made a company decision to use clang instead.
That decision was made for technical reasons, not licensing reasons.

Ian

>