From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 86029 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2019 12:49:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 86018 invoked by uid 89); 16 Apr 2019 12:49:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=february, Emrich, emrich, February X-HELO: mail-vk1-f174.google.com Received: from mail-vk1-f174.google.com (HELO mail-vk1-f174.google.com) (209.85.221.174) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 12:49:26 +0000 Received: by mail-vk1-f174.google.com with SMTP id s63so4385723vkg.10 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 05:49:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6UjIw+rtt8SFBtSye7cmuNX4TcsihQxTtBq9Bh7O3oA=; b=sPFUzNPZ+ehMmJyYuDZcjdgQrG8px4nCNHQKlat/Ri+IF05owviboJYRFTrJtIG0KO REw/13Cp58OeH9gcfIeqMatjYYtxiVuxtq6sINl78m8NIeC26cz++nq3Yv8SQLZ+AoxB Z/6NoVaTml+97wM3hcgYtH98ssmJyF7CLZHl2B/B3xqfHSbnZTtC1s416QP194bIeXyj Q9kkUKkx9LkW2Xtn2haWPlpGZ4Gvr5ZuR+vz4XHjYYu+DI9QjFT9rLjvUV+SQ7HKCrnD +rk5IKmkzKsch+07GFL5F+30p6aOocou97SS8mSMWFaVXJJdrt26NBk6Ew8w7+7gbc8R sNvw== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190415153842.GU21066@tucnak> <34226dcf-24e4-370f-0f88-a69d979aef2e@emrich-ebersheim.de> <97c67265-af2a-b3f2-eecc-168abf4b5a6c@emrich-ebersheim.de> <8baf303a-9f01-15ec-7bbc-7b3419a96f00@emrich-ebersheim.de> <782fe033-0797-5574-0d62-af3ab4bf881e@emrich-ebersheim.de> <504c2014-9764-c638-bf3a-0802132eb475@emrich-ebersheim.de> In-Reply-To: <504c2014-9764-c638-bf3a-0802132eb475@emrich-ebersheim.de> From: Christophe Lyon Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 12:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: dg-extract-results broken since rev 268511, was Re: Status of 9.0.1 20190415 [trunk revision 270358] on x86_64-w64-mingw32 To: Rainer Emrich Cc: Jakub Jelinek , gcc Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-04/txt/msg00171.txt.bz2 On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 14:34, Rainer Emrich wrote: > > Am 16.04.2019 um 14:10 schrieb Christophe Lyon: > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 13:04, Rainer Emrich wrote: > >> > >> Am 16.04.2019 um 11:59 schrieb Rainer Emrich: > >>> Am 15.04.2019 um 20:12 schrieb Rainer Emrich: > >>>> Am 15.04.2019 um 17:43 schrieb Rainer Emrich: > >>>>> Am 15.04.2019 um 17:38 schrieb Jakub Jelinek: > >>>>>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 05:30:14PM +0200, Rainer Emrich wrote: > >>>>>>> There seems to be a generic issue with the tests in gcc/testsuite. The > >>>>>>> log files do not contain the logs. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Perhaps contrib/dg-extract-results* misbehaved? > >>>>>> Can you look for the testsuite/g++*/g++.log.sep files? Do they contain > >>>>>> everything? > >>>> The *.log.sep files seem to be ok. > >>>> > >>>>>> If yes, can you try to say > >>>>>> mv contrib/dg-extract-results.py{,.bad} > >>>>>> and retry, to see if there isn't a problem with the python version thereof? > >>>> I will try this over the night. > >>> The shell version of dg-extract-results does not work either. > >>> > >>> AFAIS, there were changes to the dg-extract-results script 5th of March. > >>> Looks like these changes are causing the issue, but I'm not sure. > >>> > >>> What I can say, my setup works at least for the gcc-8 branch and used to > >>> work in the past. > >> I tested dg-extractresults.sh manually and found that the change from > >> 4th of February, revision 268411 broke the log extraction. Easy to test > >> with version from 23rd of September last year which works. > >> > >> I don't have the time to analyze the python version, but my bet, it's > >> the same issue. > >> > > Hi, > > > > Sorry for the breakage, I really wanted to improve those scripts. > > Could you give me a reproducer, since we didn't notice problems in our > > validations? > Hi Christope, > > I executed the dg-extract-results.sh manually in the gcc/testsuite > directory after a complete testsuite run which didn't give the correct > results. Rev. 240429 gives the expected results, where rev 268511 fails. > I'm on windows using msys2 with bash 4.4.23. > > I'm bootsrapping at the moment but that's really slow on windows. When > the testsuite run is finished I try to assemble a reproducer. This will > take a while. > OK, thanks! Do you mean the problem happens on Windows only? > Thanks, > > Rainer >