From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-x429.google.com (mail-pf1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::429]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D51413858C52 for ; Mon, 29 May 2023 13:09:49 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org D51413858C52 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-pf1-x429.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-64d1e96c082so2435229b3a.1 for ; Mon, 29 May 2023 06:09:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1685365789; x=1687957789; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=86C03mXLsrQ2Fkt1Y/SaQAoAAg8IJZWReB4qRe2BW7s=; b=JlGizu6o4GGJeuJBUEpSqv0o/ZUfHnm2fCBxzzji6QppYoy7hyBHz+dGEDzo0DYgQ5 ZaR1FjzX6lWRDbMV79NDsX0BizeAyuPooWdCaWxs+49ZtiEegmemdYYqBy+R7MeVObWJ INJbHy3YVP0OJ/REosZ1ZNqCc3ukNKG1EQgB8d+4WXF3yM4d4Lx2WJcqWqN65JFxPgLr xK/HWUfkUe1Qa6uGnUQCC64lZ1fG5P5Lefdy9teO0E6LUQWR+SzbhQ+67pcbOA/W4ylB 6onU775CtSAzXgpFpK9j4hGhu1goZzb3RpqGXeI6dDLV8IjcA1s4SDLTHUQEPWWkUDgr 8tzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685365789; x=1687957789; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=86C03mXLsrQ2Fkt1Y/SaQAoAAg8IJZWReB4qRe2BW7s=; b=ekGv+IjS2A0r1eSZ5mqzngvvUidWa0B53CyrLC9LuNYz5J+jfiuRH3BkAdCHTyNVO4 pv9fV3Xj3o7HQM0Y68KPkfJ2FCWinclNREDZ3IwCJNrKQzPOnQSy2/tKN1JybVzBh7zR u+FKuh50k4dgXRN7gf+VH+P7AbO0kwa3IfemdjZjYbq6aM4eVUNHURvFHZOqGdkEjhh3 0RI+8npWxi7IhX6ga7R3Wm0PUE6fRZDrSwBLU8BfFt40M42f2qqBnXXsdwUwDehpcOTb LWGPlnTfoswOjPTCpjM4NpE5lxH9TbOr89cjJnChNrRh/ypRbe8fLcyI0Ruo8rSifmuE Fvyw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyyb+xwZD0IY8H0Ke/DTeoZKKnducjEiR9KsM3MGS+jwUj2kvAi KDgnWMqm0AqYQB+2Hbmw4FSDgADWY2+KoniGojZ3j4wdT2LJyiA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5RLNqWCPo/Tmab6bIkeIr7BvwnxmPfetrXQFr5rFyouArYXt+1121jrz64n3O8kMIx6q1vY2n30lhfIqzrDyA= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1d0b:b0:255:63e0:1248 with SMTP id on11-20020a17090b1d0b00b0025563e01248mr10532769pjb.0.1685365788631; Mon, 29 May 2023 06:09:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Benjamin Priour Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 15:09:37 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Testing a patch To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Cc: David Malcolm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi, Regstrapping finally done for PR109439 - Spurious -Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value tagging along -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds. Now only a OOB warning is reported when necessary instead of OOB + Use of uninitialized value. Some tests in analyzer (out-of-bounds-*, realloc-5, pr101962) were checking for the now removed use-of-uninitialized-value warning, and therefore I fixed that. But now I'm confused since the documentation reads that to perform regtesting, one should use make -k check, and that's what I always use too, but because I fixed the above test files, contrib/compare_tests obviously complains about them having disappeared. Does it mean regtesting failed ? Can I submit the patch in its current state or should I do something else before doing so ? Guess I would get feedback anyway if something's wrong. I figured I would send it here rather than to gcc-patches, as it's more general than a discussion over a single patch. Thanks, Benjamin