From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-x42b.google.com (mail-pf1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42b]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 282E43850400 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 02:17:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 282E43850400 Received: by mail-pf1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id q20so5686937pfu.8 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 18:17:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PrfuObweMw9w+L+ohCJ0wK+NGVP3poyFHdgqFiHy4/I=; b=MT66RwgZG5yO8EvdZfeNGnuUGSQ9enFkrlH6qgjDjHWpmjHMHAqfGVsvKOmpoCW6Jt 4E6Qhpmy20QaRGLFtneNJKRXuoYJwQLYqQH5RSjVysi9hszWkOWrYfCV09huE5+TFtLs 7xPbvVWGs9RleEOoY/KbfP/4lFraIn0O/eaHDoQj1PFzuE/Xf+Fuf2XCX9bbOzYmbKZW JGVJXdow7h1YeUBaJcN7SoiMSRBbOy2lns+PDuej4mVcdzbwX3PK8B/ZwUHaDeuTHN3w oLgYUU0Lu7mRsYcbntO1I7yJzeuLUHxKZ4H6nWSmdQgl7J7eoBQXGz4LyQtmLPf0D/+A qMBA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5320QzoHcFYtTZogvo+7NpTs43AzbjfVZ1YOyPXiJZOppzZc3uU8 tz4nFlsNLddi9y06u3+rNjKY4oQNxw4wo1+z9h0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyMj0w+y8q++8YbI0gl8BdAx2nr/68uze8l7boiF0xHrlS99/5SdX7KLAS8jhG8GAJ5VOe5Yz69FnIMdcGLWpI= X-Received: by 2002:a63:5b0e:: with SMTP id p14mr17925625pgb.110.1613960223251; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 18:17:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Neven Sajko Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 02:16:52 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Doc fix request: C/C++ extended asm empty input constraint To: Jonathan Wakely Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 02:17:05 -0000 On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 08:11, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021, 00:48 Neven Sajko via Gcc, wrote: >> >> >> This is why I am asking for this feature to be documented. It seems >> like this would be the most appropriate place: >> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html#InputOperands >> >> I would have tried to contribute a doc fix myself, but I couldn't find >> the sources for the online docs in the GCC Git repository. > > > > git grep is your friend. The relevant section is: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=gcc/doc/extend.texi;h=e110cb010617bfb78e740433c3aa30a7399b504e;hb=HEAD#l10344 I posted a patch back then (a week ago) to gcc-patches, but there was no response. I'm not complaining, but I wonder if I should maybe ping a developer interested in the extended asm extension specifically? Who might that be? This is the patch in the archive: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-February/565339.html Thanks, Neven