Re: On rms controversy

["pawel k." <pawel.kunio@gmail.com>]

Thank You Jonathan for your very valuable opinions. I was sure the more far
lefty you are the less you will understand me, if my assumptions about your
worldviews are correct. If not apologies. Ill review your previous stance
on rms mess and explain.


Ill reply with a quote from one of my tee shirts:

"Your story has truly touched my heart. Never before have i met a person
with as many problems as you. Now [edited] go away and stop bothering me."

Aka i value your opinion but instead of critique you say "youre stupid"
awaiting for me to say "no, you are stupid" which i wont do as im not as
low clown as kindly you. Enough toying with unlogical clown of you as you
were kind to call me.

Best regards,
Kunio

Ps i share some trait with rms if that mattered to a clown in a clown show.



śr., 14.04.2021, 15:51 użytkownik Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
napisał:

> On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 13:38, David Malcolm wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 08:01 +0100, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Apr 2021, 07:50 pawel k. via Gcc, <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [...snip...]
> >
> > > Very logical argument, thanks for sharing.
> >
> > Jonathan, it's clear to me that you're being sarcastic, but it might
> > not be clear to others.  Please avoid sarcasm - it amplifies
> > misunderstanding on the internet, and it seems to me that that's
> > counterproductive when discussing a sensitive topic.
>
> For the avoidance of doubt, I was being sarcastic. I didn't think it
> was a logical argument, I thought it was one of the worst so far in
> this whole clownshow.
>
> > I disagree with much of what Pawel wrote, but this discussion has left
> > me feeling drained.  I don't have the mental energy to do a point-by-
> > point response, and I don't think it would be a productive thing to
> > post to this mailing list.
>
> Which is why I went for sarcasm instead.
>