From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <kevinl@rivosinc.com>
Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com (mail-lf1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12f])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B85B93858C52
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 18:51:38 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B85B93858C52
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com
Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id j16so9530542lfe.12
        for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:51:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=rivosinc-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=kyKej6/R9vUqyUI88a4OKPg9W5bHmUpBCn6Xr3A/Y3Q=;
        b=ezi+cgAKdrCOK97iInefrZxHwf8y6RfMVlHGJNKYSfzQr9nEDn4rJcboUxTG77Tw/4
         PtvqeK/+8RjQo9Z6n1VGy6EGpKMtrd0HNC+vUqznGWtiuVIqZgGbiJGcvI9/6n5bRfsd
         N4VVta19MOpwfYufxAdXLEr6KmSjY9ODl5z68mFYjC2+rmxhNH9yT4yhViHmw5VO66A6
         NzeQHFmbe81mBas1xJ68FS34bdn64/V96/qNIdgDSeAmO/H//NzihfRtdLxh4Iiab8xI
         7ERVXU0RmRIPcD3Eluo7EGo+InHlL06raYTOM5IAznDK19PHYhg03D0LsrCb19ZPBZQ2
         K0OA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
         :reply-to;
        bh=kyKej6/R9vUqyUI88a4OKPg9W5bHmUpBCn6Xr3A/Y3Q=;
        b=f9ZQMdEPjzgPtl3kI1V0wtMvpvWxPE8JuTFTpK+FRcJt/3rHjmf5gNwCZeLZSEz+j+
         ObocpCgSiDKeYDmRJBtbNCG7JPV7213MBzd28Pn/GIOZbNhgQs23SdKX4u2uq6P3fcqu
         33xze9rcS1LdaGdxyDIXJu3z5b0My4R2wAXYskFJrG5izZpaAY1s4tJjrSz1m1QySRut
         WqYjOkxTOnknqVt08gR00oMLjAhrJ/et7aJaNJTJpSjzgebTcSvJ4ji7OC7yX3da5nhW
         aKglilHraqwifLdgkLDZRjzbpZI5iZZjVW6kadUSoezjM7vFRGO0h4Ktgwe1QEbGhbaN
         BcIA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnGHP6cwP1vPD7nkYkr4wCZqqAsWLth95Aj5wB0Tj2KreZgs5gX
	4/glsJLy0ti6OdXRLxxqCsOlybPe+UowpVCHRjcnsA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6gvBnRwWLtKLcQGmAot7jxxlC6yL7ZfWmuPWUV8w2IhN4/OdTd+wrjOA8FvUFAeWuWO4waU/wXFi/MHsjKWik=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:6442:0:b0:497:a17d:d848 with SMTP id
 b2-20020a196442000000b00497a17dd848mr1128964lfj.381.1668192697230; Fri, 11
 Nov 2022 10:51:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALkvSf9Vk3N1_NdsQCJWVKwrvT3syMk65h2ZD8jFkNtxjS6w2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <037c79a6-037a-768d-3794-abd065d41831@inria.fr> <CA+=Sn1=KGiO6rF_HQFc8dra8FYcBAc7zu01XyXOGiDx3E3qqeA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+=Sn1=KGiO6rF_HQFc8dra8FYcBAc7zu01XyXOGiDx3E3qqeA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kevin Lee <kevinl@rivosinc.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:51:26 -0800
Message-ID: <CALkvSf-+jB3h8QVjoMP1xgb4qAXcPi1k3pm95sW3XyJM-wSkjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Different outputs in Gimple pass dump generated by two different architectures
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>

On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 8:39 AM Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 12:57 AM Marc Glisse via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Nov 2022, Kevin Lee wrote:

> > > What would be causing the difference? Is this intended? Link
> > > <https://godbolt.org/z/eWxnYsK1z> for details. Thank you!
> >
> > See LOGICAL_OP_NON_SHORT_CIRCUIT in fold-const.cc (and various discussions
> > on the topic in mailing lists and bugzilla).
>

Thank you for the pointer Marc!

> I filed https://gcc.gnu.org/PR107642 to cover the issues around
> LOGICAL_OP_NON_SHORT_CIRCUIT and BRANCH_COST.
> I hope to get some time in the GCC 14 timeframe to flush out some of
> these target macro/hooks issue where the
> definitions are not so clear.
>

This PR was a great explanation for the macro. Thanks!