From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com (mail-lf1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04F0D3858D28 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:06:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 04F0D3858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id l12so6012247lfp.6 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 16:06:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=q+7eF96lsx8yUQJOlbCufbQz8L/VWaUDgQYmjkf/sp8=; b=QaH/MsDIbEaYmBmqnFHdjaQxATanY/TEjyjtKbfU66k9AG2twgCCGVWYgeDbo+9bVY t138SboJZ3RQPw0omVFqE9Y6tBUFzGtfHkO14/iCgYlyBdihfelsKXQL5UbyGkeno3kH rbPMph7Yjf2T+DGLzDfJFD9hWHTCAa3QLzBrJDfBBK+O9PAif6yqm7x2pjc9mXk4qXym 72QfIYIwitsgxpYIyWK+DMKF56YRBFUWTJJ0+opFtlPB5jMawConJ8Z01lO6gEhIU3dI ya1KSdYJD/JOeJ1NZluDPejQLtYPQsd38BQcXyQBP6yMyiX7OH50or87OFWpQYDZar0R aqAw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=q+7eF96lsx8yUQJOlbCufbQz8L/VWaUDgQYmjkf/sp8=; b=kayqwTuayFkoSmezwlqfa/Cami+j5+19ClsFvX3L5v/xBU+zYiw3Y1nrgPup7YuyYj xVMtRp4NIpOULcQd1Lr9boga9YUyREqfeC4D/fquXio2JrCGkrxd6VInQ9JoLUBp2z5P zzKParphCgJauI5UIGcfo/L0xSidj0Bp4LjJeGmNd1o2dj0fmUO3JpFTMRac86tNy3no WOKW0BYQkx9Q5uTA4UzDl6IZjnV0Dl8xQqJ2ySlzMVUXp2bhKEBh5Aq3kkiMVknGg4hI Bw7P9Vmno3dXGgIXy+WKhWZenrloeH8N4KIlcg88O9Bk+m8UjR7LAZKPPdujV7+Rx3tw zbJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3IiTewtsd1GNMsUyNFhVE+7zBdHShX7DtGgdCL9HHtO30XZACx SvdSynbQSLkl7vOS1XY9yj9PYzqTvt7DD4NN8RiUfd+xlqZwwA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM57XSGoVx8EMDHuCDj/ehU+1u1lvtT+hkUP5YVDPVDEiyDpE1Iw2Dxx8dnL4Oq5azBWxTNM7mWveMWSG4ra3BE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:39d6:b0:4b0:f505:919b with SMTP id k22-20020a05651239d600b004b0f505919bmr1942060lfu.306.1668125166654; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 16:06:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Kevin Lee Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 16:05:55 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Different outputs in Gimple pass dump generated by two different architectures To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ffecfc05ed26a7d8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HTML_MESSAGE,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: --000000000000ffecfc05ed26a7d8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello GCC, While looking at the failure for gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c, I observed that x86-64 and risc-v has a different output for the gimple pass since r12-4790-g4b3a325f07acebf4 . What would be causing the difference? Is this intended? Link for details. Thank you! Sincerely, Kevin --000000000000ffecfc05ed26a7d8--