From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12441 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2013 12:52:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12431 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2013 12:52:57 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO mail-la0-f41.google.com) (209.85.215.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 12:52:57 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id ec20so1395006lab.0 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 05:52:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.200.9 with SMTP id jo9mr27787874lbc.54.1375188768627; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 05:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.71.10 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 05:52:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51F7719B.9050502@redhat.com> References: <51F66CA9.4040803@redhat.com> <51F67A08.2070709@redhat.com> <51F7719B.9050502@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 12:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file From: David Starner To: Andrew Haley Cc: Bruce Korb , FX , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" , "jwakely.gcc@gmail.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00454.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: > "We" is the GCC community. "We" really want multilibs to be built so > they get tested as much as possible. It's in the best interest of > all GCC users that this happens. "We" really want Ada to be built so that it gets tested as much as possible. "We" really want ARM to be built so that it gets tested as much as possible. I don't see the distinction. Those who need multilibs support should be responsible for making sure that it works right. Presumably enough people do need it. Those that don't should have to shoulder the burden for those who do. > So don't write one. Then you're likely to be proved right. So what you're saying is that "we" don't care if people can easily build "our" compiler. -- Kie ekzistas vivo, ekzistas espero.