From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com (mail-pf1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29E873858409 for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 20:53:29 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 29E873858409 Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id u20so24424184pfi.12 for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 12:53:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LKiTA4Mdf/EgnUJb9320XlWiiop3kk4DDj2s9QKW1X0=; b=pIlTjmnM6Szxkkqa3aCNoRVI12QvaKDCLtQC8DITSkTwZASkmgwhE79Gp45fxzz8P7 fkzTvy63s3M2k8TyLcwy6G+NzobhvOI/cjsiWPZdrIJS/20aI0C7FjVjIygyiBJoJ00K OsQXUSkRZIooXNFXsIHroW0hi2XIwM2em4l9VZAj26pkmWawsYPXkCVJzag6+fH9hFgm Ts9mdFHsTd09WU6yHronShpe43Yy4eUrkxKH4BV2SQbt33ihqY71NYWTxJLU3VLkXJmN OEliuyHxy7OTkKRMJDX2y+1Z1eigaBJim2EQRRqbg956w2PYkFU+00mnv60y+wNA7HhT SbAw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533PN70JAOOjaYLEZU0nIm+1YGSOACI13iGAZf1xtDOlMs73L2BN IypJRd3vukC+z/aq4iKNQDWX2QRaeNXkYOPedcU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyO7rCHuof7Qj0hzTDC5Jz1iAtoLU00b6d2Whm/pv4llNjIZWO9ZnwKABomgXjJX68WUf+3uLpTi+p//HriBh4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2402:b0:4a8:4557:e96b with SMTP id z2-20020a056a00240200b004a84557e96bmr36738571pfh.76.1640984008209; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 12:53:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211231182010.107040-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> <87h7aofqtx.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> In-Reply-To: <87h7aofqtx.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> From: "H.J. Lu" Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 12:52:52 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Optimize memset for zeroing To: Florian Weimer Cc: "H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha" , Noah Goldstein , GCC Development , Arjan van de Ven Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1008.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 20:53:30 -0000 On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 12:43 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * H. J. Lu via Libc-alpha: > > > bzero is an alias of SSE2 memset in glibc. Should we add __memsetzero > > like __memcmpeq? It should be almost free in glibc. GCC can use > > __memsetzero if it is available. > > bzero does not have the interface ambiguity that bcmp has. So the > only reason for not using it would be namespace cleanliness. bzero isn't a standard C function and it isn't optimized like memset in glibc. -- H.J.