From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 75610 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2015 21:41:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 75599 invoked by uid 89); 23 Feb 2015 21:41:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ob0-f181.google.com Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f181.google.com) (209.85.214.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 21:41:20 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id vb8so39324084obc.12 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:41:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.107.195 with SMTP id g186mr8577968oic.67.1424727678045; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:41:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.134.102 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:41:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20140929110019.GC17454@tucnak.redhat.com> References: <87r3z33g2q.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net> <54205555.5040506@redhat.com> <0EFAB2BDD0F67E4FB6CCC8B9F87D756969B792F6@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> <871tqug0ft.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net> <20140929110019.GC17454@tucnak.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 21:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally? From: "H.J. Lu" To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: Thomas Schwinge , "Zamyatin, Igor" , Jeff Law , "Iyer, Balaji V" , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00219.txt.bz2 On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:56:06PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >> Hi! >> >> On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:02:30 +0000, "Zamyatin, Igor" wrote: >> > Jeff Law wrote: >> > > The original plan was for Balaji to take on this role; however, his assignment >> > > within Intel has changed and thus he's not going to have time to work on >> > > Cilk+ anymore. >> > > >> > > Igor Zamyatin has been doing a fair amount of Cilk+ maintenance/bugfixing >> > > and it might make sense for him to own it in the long term if he's interested. >> > >> > That's right. >> >> Thanks! >> >> > Can I add 2 records (cilk plus and libcilkrts) to Various Maintainers section? >> >> I understand Jeff's email as a pre-approval of such a patch. > > I think only SC can appoint maintainers, and while Jeff is in the SC, > my reading of that mail wasn't that it was the SC that has acked that, but > rather a question if Igor is willing to take that role, which then would > need to be acked by SC. > Where are we on this? Do we have a maintainer for Cilk Plus and its run-time library? -- H.J.