From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2a]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 938E43858C50 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2023 21:20:37 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 938E43858C50 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gwmail.gwu.edu Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gwmail.gwu.edu ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 938E43858C50 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2a ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1702848038; cv=none; b=oqcgNgbhcpuB0wTPRfyzqkZy+lIRsZho9IRQc9Dc6V2pNoIRgFtOt7PWBvtQJmtOKR4hvstGTeChKknaxd5S1D1n35FZGKQ3t1B5i6d6GEUJ60/DJBt8Cwo3d2DKhBR7X6/MyXKAH9A9Eleb+f102FjvNez65OKCwaIDdXLhgNY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1702848038; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+MzKEB+4480M/tQyvQqgqJS8hKUPrZWCzUVqsgkZQ7A=; h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To; b=mABMHo1SGoG4WiT2p3E3gu8hcvIRBncXRihs1cpXMqdpI+S/+sGHo+2LayC/e6ZeLfEnNyPPL3C0cgsumj5dPCJpgj6NxTwKYGr7YxMHDjm1pe1PpVHFJIza4GYzCeiWtA1q0l4VxY5wMMZv/usUlqu06bM5+XfTJfXFPJSw7ZI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: by mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-4b6c1d3edcfso165255e0c.2 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2023 13:20:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gwmail.gwu.edu; s=google; t=1702848037; x=1703452837; darn=gcc.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=+MzKEB+4480M/tQyvQqgqJS8hKUPrZWCzUVqsgkZQ7A=; b=D9sa5UMCnKvNmivRn7jl3ElQHpx7LEALYY3xkJlRDr4t5zD5OpuW7MaVICzJDyRjFk +o3tnnIBaa1Xvk1RHtsQVld3YoFnmg7Qqs6gr0Ab9MQn0vrRGM90gsQuRBvdNob/RF33 +Um0ddYP8iND7Biyv16xnThSHp8zexh3ehH8W2dgCWWwU8xdkfGkJvvh9RFkQ/lMWYw7 Ms5rQy5aZHTj8iJ+VGohy3TRMIZVw06UQzJTbVrPccXlqGOK2dDSQIQsNRDow5DWgUw/ wxxIA43ZYv/fCLYdC4XxCu4jkrk8VNeRDH8Sy7qr+fZZapt49YiIpIUNBkyjjAoa7bvk x/lw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1702848037; x=1703452837; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+MzKEB+4480M/tQyvQqgqJS8hKUPrZWCzUVqsgkZQ7A=; b=wGYITeirRTLhijT9iTJYymrHHdgOhRzZf5cDwkLe/4kGMvWlnEwmo7D5TDo+dwJx5A bLGMqLmbzNFn/KHUU6kOCh8hDDaAkymyLr/UVNECEWfAoyBsUh1cIAW7dmH4cZgX/wmY T+3u4wEgsz8xUZ0vYxPcER14nziyBrDi9yqQy39UabxpsKF8qQ95MEB/BVvjrNjm4faV mb1NF3SvAoRj7fzfb2u6U4l/VXeWVRXdDyY14U/5Xxc1zUj84R3yltkiqApVRiBIct9j 2oJb1BvcwgwxyLhDWzOZJymDHu1BCrHo1SPpwhFFbDSWWWoDxwzq9oyitRrdlaL8+GSt PUKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxjm+45wZ3hszBrHcuathUiHiihqPnadIslQL5VYAlDGkbe2Str 00YsIPEU8i7eB4Qo9avYeHkFZffMtY91e1IQNzTU4Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFRWwUaBrtuyxKJvXFtpv5yD2uCZWFyn3pKs1HdSfOSOWPvH3QwJNMDiar/E7EBOByyzP+rm/6rKp1K4cugzmg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:3e09:b0:466:9e21:7493 with SMTP id j9-20020a0561023e0900b004669e217493mr3946vsv.5.1702848036809; Sun, 17 Dec 2023 13:20:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Eric Gallager Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2023 16:20:25 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Deprecating -fgnu-tm support for GCC 14 and removing it for GCC 15 To: Andrew Pinski Cc: GCC Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 3:16=E2=80=AFPM Andrew Pinski via Gcc wrote: > > -fgnu-tm support has not been improved since GCC 5 or earlier. It is > not even supported with LTO. Does it make sense to deprecate the > support for GCC 14 and remove it in GCC 15? > > Thanks, > Andrew Pinski Personally, since GCC is in stage 3 now, I would push that schedule back a release and move deprecation to GCC 15, and then only remove it for GCC 16 if no one objects, but then again I don't actually use -fgnu-tm myself, so I wouldn't be too upset if the faster schedule is chosen instead. Eric Gallager