From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10634 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2013 09:29:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10624 invoked by uid 89); 27 Nov 2013 09:29:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-we0-f175.google.com Received: from Unknown (HELO mail-we0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 09:29:41 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id p61so6386858wes.6 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 01:29:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=rQuv03y6Ca0cYF4UlRBignK2hX3IA5mQ1ZzRR2q3SF4=; b=Qf691Ox8Ihb7+4c2yQQWARGy5rk+xVF83j1cBj13eLDU7piQQ0CAPVNdFoFf8V2fJA U1H5035tr8z/44OX45zFrTiPGtiu45/hHXGaZ+5VKgZLgVUCYOrjIYzHEBIwuznfJ/fd Vebp4FooviIpSWFp7GjoRHG9XNKDKLlAkG/oupslXX/Y6/S6Ne/JMiqtL0UEvb6qIgRd YN4XrCCGN7cfDGj10pccmV+6QrdyrXJSh9dry2R8+PMqB0oOKktnQRZX7PKc7CPH54hY JlNLuxrxC9pY6MTUhIaQYe245WEcoDLJsbYacQt+LCuYIBgGXXrvcNrNmWHZECXzyuBU 68Fw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm/cHUkls2Cz6lsXAnSORNjRPKKI0Pvl68+hvon7CvWk+2Ykhx0SIMnLlGVCm03tRQelJCP MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.97.5 with SMTP id dw5mr21606579wib.42.1385544571537; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 01:29:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.174.202 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 01:29:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20131127082210.GZ30563@lug-owl.de> References: <20131126032013.GO30563@lug-owl.de> <20131126032625.GA30563@lug-owl.de> <20131127082210.GZ30563@lug-owl.de> Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 09:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [buildrobot] mep-elf From: Joern Rennecke To: Jan-Benedict Glaw Cc: GCC , DJ Delorie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00568.txt.bz2 On 27 November 2013 08:22, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > Looking at the code, I see no way how rclass could be used > uninitialized. The diagnostic message looks wrong to me. May need a > fix at a totally different location, where it is issued ;) That's PR49401: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49401