* Re: [GSOC-2019] - Csmith fuzzer leveraging GCC C Extensions
[not found] <CAN=hqDC9nkMC5Ln=Rw=mr1eJ0pFenYY3reOfxcNTZy1dr5PzPg@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2019-05-15 8:43 ` Martin Liška
2019-05-15 9:24 ` Shubham Narlawar
2019-05-15 8:53 ` Martin Liška
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Martin Liška @ 2019-05-15 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shubham Narlawar, gcc
On 5/15/19 9:49 AM, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> Hello Martin and community,
Hi Shubham.
Thank you for starting working on the project. There are some recommendations
before we fully being:
1) I've recently received 5 emails that have very similar subject and it's
unclear why that happened? When you e.g. forget to add something into
an email, it's easier to reply to your email and just mention what
was forgotten.
2) Please reply to this email thread and for each new functionality, please
adjust email subject so that it's easier to orient.
3) I would recommend to make a separate branch for each functionality and
send a branch name here. I can easily pull and don't have to apply a patch.
4) Can we directly use pull requests into https://github.com/csmith-project/csmith ?
I can comment the changes there if you want.
5) I'm quite new to csmith, so be patient with me ;)
6) Are you familiar with coding style of CSmith? I can't verify changes in that area.
Thanks for working on that.
Martin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [GSOC-2019] - Csmith fuzzer leveraging GCC C Extensions
[not found] <CAN=hqDC9nkMC5Ln=Rw=mr1eJ0pFenYY3reOfxcNTZy1dr5PzPg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-05-15 8:43 ` [GSOC-2019] - Csmith fuzzer leveraging GCC C Extensions Martin Liška
@ 2019-05-15 8:53 ` Martin Liška
2019-05-15 9:25 ` Shubham Narlawar
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Martin Liška @ 2019-05-15 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shubham Narlawar, gcc
On 5/15/19 9:49 AM, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> void func_1();
> void func_3();
> .....
>
> void foo1() __attribute__ ((weak, alias("func_1")));
> void foo3() __attribute__ ((weak, alias("func_3")));
Hi.
In all emails that you sent there's no patch that will implement 'alias' attribute.
Thanks,
Martin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [GSOC-2019] - Csmith fuzzer leveraging GCC C Extensions
2019-05-15 8:43 ` [GSOC-2019] - Csmith fuzzer leveraging GCC C Extensions Martin Liška
@ 2019-05-15 9:24 ` Shubham Narlawar
2019-05-16 9:02 ` Jonathan Wakely
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Shubham Narlawar @ 2019-05-15 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Liška, gcc
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 2:13 PM Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
> On 5/15/19 9:49 AM, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> > Hello Martin and community,
>
> Hi Shubham.
>
> Thank you for starting working on the project. There are some
> recommendations
> before we fully being:
>
> 1) I've recently received 5 emails that have very similar subject and it's
> unclear why that happened? When you e.g. forget to add something into
> an email, it's easier to reply to your email and just mention what
> was forgotten.
>
I tried to send you Aligned patch and one csmith program but it bounces
back. I don't know why it happened. Sorry for sending mail 5 times. Sure, I
will reply to single thread.
> 2) Please reply to this email thread and for each new functionality, please
> adjust email subject so that it's easier to orient.
>
> 3) I would recommend to make a separate branch for each functionality and
> send a branch name here. I can easily pull and don't have to apply a
> patch.
>
Sure.
>
> 4) Can we directly use pull requests into
> https://github.com/csmith-project/csmith ?
> I can comment the changes there if you want.
>
I have created a fork github.com/shubhamnarlawar77/csmith/tree/csmith-gcc
I will make branch of csmith-gcc and send patches to it so that you can
pull and review. After review, I will push patch into csmith-gcc fork. Does
this work for you?
> 5) I'm quite new to csmith, so be patient with me ;)
>
> 6) Are you familiar with coding style of CSmith? I can't verify changes in
> that area.
>
Yes. I am quite familiar with it.
>
> Thanks for working on that.
> Martin
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [GSOC-2019] - Csmith fuzzer leveraging GCC C Extensions
2019-05-15 8:53 ` Martin Liška
@ 2019-05-15 9:25 ` Shubham Narlawar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Shubham Narlawar @ 2019-05-15 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Liška, gcc
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 2:23 PM Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
> On 5/15/19 9:49 AM, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> > void func_1();
> > void func_3();
> > .....
> >
> > void foo1() __attribute__ ((weak, alias("func_1")));
> > void foo3() __attribute__ ((weak, alias("func_3")));
>
> Hi.
>
> In all emails that you sent there's no patch that will implement 'alias'
> attribute.
>
I have not implemented alias attribute yet. I will send it to github fork
for review after aligned attribute.
>
> Thanks,
> Martin
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [GSOC-2019] - Csmith fuzzer leveraging GCC C Extensions
2019-05-15 9:24 ` Shubham Narlawar
@ 2019-05-16 9:02 ` Jonathan Wakely
2019-05-16 9:08 ` Shubham Narlawar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2019-05-16 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shubham Narlawar; +Cc: Martin Liška, gcc
On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 10:24, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> I tried to send you Aligned patch and one csmith program but it bounces
> back. I don't know why it happened. Sorry for sending mail 5 times. Sure, I
> will reply to single thread.
If you're trying to send email to the GCC lists you need to use plain
text (no HTML emails) or it will get rejected:
https://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html#policies
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [GSOC-2019] - Csmith fuzzer leveraging GCC C Extensions
2019-05-16 9:02 ` Jonathan Wakely
@ 2019-05-16 9:08 ` Shubham Narlawar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Shubham Narlawar @ 2019-05-16 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Wakely; +Cc: Martin Liška, gcc
Thanks. I will use plain text.
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 2:32 PM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 10:24, Shubham Narlawar wrote:
> > I tried to send you Aligned patch and one csmith program but it bounces
> > back. I don't know why it happened. Sorry for sending mail 5 times. Sure, I
> > will reply to single thread.
>
> If you're trying to send email to the GCC lists you need to use plain
> text (no HTML emails) or it will get rejected:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html#policies
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-05-16 9:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CAN=hqDC9nkMC5Ln=Rw=mr1eJ0pFenYY3reOfxcNTZy1dr5PzPg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-05-15 8:43 ` [GSOC-2019] - Csmith fuzzer leveraging GCC C Extensions Martin Liška
2019-05-15 9:24 ` Shubham Narlawar
2019-05-16 9:02 ` Jonathan Wakely
2019-05-16 9:08 ` Shubham Narlawar
2019-05-15 8:53 ` Martin Liška
2019-05-15 9:25 ` Shubham Narlawar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).