From: Julian Waters <tanksherman27@gmail.com>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Applying extended assembly parsing to basic asm
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 01:34:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP2b4GOFji5sbqEEved68YSsZqA=WCV-3SoJUaChrGnt4mydRA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 462 bytes --]
Hi all,
Would it be acceptable for a changeset that applies the parsing of string
literals in extended assembly blocks to the assembly templates inside basic
asm to be mailed here? As I see it, there is no reason to keep this
behaviour from basic asm statements and it can prove to be very useful, and
I'd be happy to submit a patch for this new behaviour to be implemented.
Basic asm would continue to behave the same as before otherwise
best regards,
Julian
next reply other threads:[~2023-06-13 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-13 17:34 Julian Waters [this message]
2023-06-13 17:43 ` Alexander Monakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAP2b4GOFji5sbqEEved68YSsZqA=WCV-3SoJUaChrGnt4mydRA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=tanksherman27@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).