Man, these clang fanboys sure are getting out of hand

I feel like all this garbage can be easily resolved by y'all showing this
idiot the exact proper options required and attaching the resulting
compiled assembly exactly as he wants it, or if gcc doesn't compile the
exact assembly he wants, explaining why gcc chose a different
route than the quote on quote "Perfect assembly" that he expects it to spit
out

And Stefan? Ever heard of the saying that "the loudest man in the room is
always the weakest"?