From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2f]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6571F385843A for ; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 16:47:33 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6571F385843A Received: by mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com with SMTP id t127so8537320vsb.8 for ; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 09:47:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yQgGQMln2JnJys2vtkQpDSlhin3xPy266gWcp1VM9Uw=; b=Lh/4mVAAkOsa9P0uKz5lz4k54RuQgJmC42fiLDzXj9NODmnAPJaYNu3M79wJi4tMi3 Ue5Jdw9KH2RG3qU2LDEUh40stN/ucw7gRZptCPuXA8HhZydesF1xG5dLJ1gYcwXyFz06 XpNgzIHXD16DE3tydEmdVZHDFKuXY064jVypU5u/6LgDTbAIlmYddQqyvOitjpT3si9s XIxKUY/E6wXqyLStBRo6VQ74PMbqeWwfB3g2os6VljAV2jeDdeT3QQiHkiJH8ViT8JmS DhUZQodplSRvZKdmlnOJmPWbGdOcIiu/dO5DPUeVJZX6rHw/Z8vKQSpwoB2iSgQgMeOX WPlg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9GVJ62UuDTXYlTFBCvd5be5+hbuwid+H9hfH1yXRniX0TwHuHe 9BdTgA4rdlXpQNuMlIJx/rM9eGX6D824ZfpsJ1g= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1ufpPvIfrmEBoTygTpaQ/zEwtJy/mOyYylDSNA78IFJ9Ynl5+TwI9WSAmtgxThZv8qVbfVDjVK7FTkjtbcgJok= X-Received: by 2002:a67:a40b:0:b0:357:c4aa:e354 with SMTP id n11-20020a67a40b000000b00357c4aae354mr1202638vse.54.1658076452731; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 09:47:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6F935597-82AE-4128-B282-BE714E02B683@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6F935597-82AE-4128-B282-BE714E02B683@gmail.com> From: lkcl Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 17:47:20 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: rust non-free-compatible trademark To: Richard Biener Cc: GCC developers Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 16:47:35 -0000 On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 5:25 PM Richard Biener wrote: > > if the word "rust" is entirely removed from the gcc source code then > > there is no problem whatsoever (recall: "iceweasel"). > > We=E2=80=99ll call it gust. love it! the puns i would have recommended would have been based on "iron oxide". please bear in mind: under Trademark Law, as developers, you *must* not mak= e "announcements" saying "we *are* changing the name from rust to gust". this creates "Confusion" for which you become directly and legally liable and responsible. *users* are permitted to go, "oh look, errr there's this thing called gust and the source code compiles for rust". just as with the Java Trademark, you as developers can say "gust is compatible with the rust language" but you *cannot* say "gust is compatible with rust". Trademarks are a bitch. get legal advice. l.