From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25560 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2003 17:06:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25553 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2003 17:06:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.cdt.org) (206.112.85.61) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 4 Jan 2003 17:06:15 -0000 Received: from dberlin.org (h-69-3-5-6.MCLNVA23.covad.net [69.3.5.6]) by mail.cdt.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590F64900DE; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 12:01:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (account dberlin HELO dberlin.org) by dberlin.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.3) with ESMTP-TLS id 2085567; Sat, 04 Jan 2003 12:06:03 -0500 Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 17:22:00 -0000 Subject: Re: c++ "with" keyword Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) Cc: aph@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org To: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) From: Daniel Berlin In-Reply-To: <20030104162506.E11CFF2D4F@nile.gnat.com> Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00141.txt.bz2 > > Another danger of course is that if a half baked feature is > implemented, then it gets stuck and never removed (we will in > fact remove the "WITH TYPE" feature in GNAT when a better > substitute comes along, even though it will discombobulate > people). people? That sounds bad. Maybe you should not remove it, sticking instead to removing things that only affect code. Otherwise, you might have some mightily po'ed discombobulated people on your hands.