From: Ziemowit Laski <zlaski@apple.com>
To: Matt Austern <austern@apple.com>
Cc: gcc mailing list <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, Mike Stump <mrs@apple.com>,
Helge Hess <helge.hess@opengroupware.org>,
GNUStep <discuss-gnustep@gnu.org>,
Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>
Subject: Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 06:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D9FA47E4-39E6-11D9-8317-00039390FFE2@apple.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1B18C7B1-39E3-11D9-B2D5-000A95BCF344@apple.com>
On 18 Nov 2004, at 20.25, Matt Austern wrote:
> This discussion should probably happen offline. It's in Apple's
> interest for ObjC++ to get into mainline. It's also in Apple's
> interest to make sure that there aren't any changes that hurt compiler
> performance. It's silly for this discussion to be happening on an
> international email list when most of the people participating in it
> have offices on the same floor of the same building.
Yes, some of this "silliness" (although it is symptomatic of things
more serious) really should be confined to Apple, although I don't
think it is appropriate to take the whole discussion offline
altogether. Just as currently Geoff is blocking an approach that Mark
and Zack OKed (at least in principle), one could certainly envision
Mark, Zack or others objecting to whatever we finally manage to agree
upon in Cupertino.
--Zem
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-19 4:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-17 10:28 Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
2004-11-17 20:51 ` Mike Stump
2004-11-17 21:53 ` Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
2004-11-17 22:28 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-17 22:54 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-17 23:02 ` Nicolas Roard
2004-11-17 23:31 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-11-17 23:17 ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-17 23:50 ` Alex Perez
2004-11-18 0:06 ` Joe Buck
2004-11-18 0:35 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-18 0:46 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-18 0:53 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-11-18 1:18 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-11-18 23:22 ` Geoffrey Keating
2004-11-18 23:28 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-19 0:57 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-19 1:26 ` Rogelio Serrano
2004-11-19 1:41 ` Helge Hess
2004-11-19 4:26 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-19 5:49 ` Matt Austern
2004-11-19 6:42 ` Ziemowit Laski [this message]
2004-11-19 7:52 ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-22 3:22 ` Chuck Robey
2004-11-22 10:07 ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-22 10:31 ` Ranjit Mathew
2004-11-19 19:44 ` Dale Johannesen
2004-11-19 20:04 ` Dan Grillo
2004-11-19 20:08 ` Dave Korn
2004-11-19 13:31 Richard Kenner
2004-11-19 20:22 ` Ziemowit Laski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D9FA47E4-39E6-11D9-8317-00039390FFE2@apple.com \
--to=zlaski@apple.com \
--cc=austern@apple.com \
--cc=discuss-gnustep@gnu.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=geoffk@geoffk.org \
--cc=helge.hess@opengroupware.org \
--cc=mrs@apple.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).