From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Galloway, Greg (ISSAtlanta)" To: "'Russ Allbery'" , gcc Subject: RE: Support Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2000 07:06:00 -0000 Message-id: X-SW-Source: 2000-02/msg00014.html Russ Allbery [ mailto:rra@stanford.edu ] wrote: > Alexandre Oliva writes: > > > Nope. No gcc release prior to 2.96 or 2.97 or 3.0 or > however the next > > release ends up being called supports HP/UX 11. > > Could someone clarify (or point me at the clarification) of > just what this > means? I'm surprised by this, given that it compiles cleanly > out of the > tarball and compiles Perl with no test suite failures. This is my experience as well. I've built cleanly out of the box with gas from binutils 2.9.1. Is there a list of known problems somewhere? Thanks, Greg