From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15945 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2002 15:01:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15937 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2002 15:01:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ngate.noida.hcltech.com) (202.54.110.230) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2002 15:01:43 -0000 Received: from exch-01.noida.hcltech.com (exch-01 [204.160.254.29]) by ngate.noida.hcltech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA16175; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 20:30:23 +0530 Received: by exch-01.noida.hcltech.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 20:29:01 +0530 Message-ID: From: "Nitin Gupta, Noida" To: Mark Mitchell Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: RE: libstdc++ support for H8300-elf in gcc 3.1.1 Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 11:45:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg01377.txt.bz2 Hi, I'm confused! I don't see this patch checked in gcc sources in the described version number of the gcc/configure.in http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2001-09/msg00001.html It is not present in gcc 3.1.1 however it is there in sources downloded from cvs head (3.3) @subversions.gnu.org:/cvsroot/gcc. Can this patch be released with 3.2 also? Regards. Nitin. > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Mitchell [mailto:mark@codesourcery.com] > Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 10:48 PM > To: Nitin Gupta, Noida > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: libstdc++ support for H8300-elf in gcc 3.1.1 > > > > Is that a too much of work for next release? > > No; adding support for features that did not exist is OK. > > -- > Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com > CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com >