* checking for a hard register !!
@ 2002-08-07 0:34 Naveen Sharma, Noida
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Naveen Sharma, Noida @ 2002-08-07 0:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Hi,
Is it all right to replace all tests of the
of the form
(REG_NO) < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER
by
HARD_REGISTER_P (REG_NO) (defined in rtl.h already)
It would have two advantages
1. More readable.
2. If the perception of what a "hard reg" is changes in future
it would be easy to incorporate the semantics.
Best Regards,
Naveen Sharma.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-08-07 0:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-08-07 0:34 checking for a hard register !! Naveen Sharma, Noida
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).