From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-64531-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28295 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2002 05:44:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28286 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2002 05:44:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ngate.noida.hcltech.com) (202.54.110.230)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Dec 2002 05:44:28 -0000
Received: from exch-01.noida.hcltech.com (exch-01 [204.160.254.29])
	by ngate.noida.hcltech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA01247;
	Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:11:41 +0530
Received: by exch-01.noida.hcltech.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <YTL6ZJ09>; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:08:44 +0530
Message-ID: <E04CF3F88ACBD5119EFE00508BBB2121061C318D@exch-01.noida.hcltech.com>
From: "Sanjiv Kumar Gupta, Noida" <sanjivg@noida.hcltech.com>
To: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@godzilla.ics.uci.edu>
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>, Dale Johannesen <dalej@apple.com>,
        gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: possible gcse failure: not able to eliminate redundant loads
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 23:42:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00705.txt.bz2

>It works just fine on SPARC, so it might be something specific to your
>port... 

>        ldd     [%o0+8], %f8
>        cmp     %o2, 2  !  i

We have reg+offset mode for SPARC here. So that's find with alias.c.
mine is SH4. I fear IA64 may probably have the same problem.

--Sanjiv