From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Received: (qmail 27641 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2003 05:11:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ngate.noida.hcltech.com) (202.54.110.230) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 10 Jan 2003 05:11:43 -0000 Received: from exch-01.noida.hcltech.com (exch-01 [204.160.254.29]) by ngate.noida.hcltech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA14650; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 10:36:38 +0530 Received: by exch-01.noida.hcltech.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 10:35:51 +0530 Message-ID: From: "D.Venkatasubramanian, Noida" To: Kazu Hirata , Andrew.Volkov@transas.com Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, crossgcc@sources.redhat.com, gnuh8@gnuh8.org.uk Subject: RE: New targets to Binutils for H8 series Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 07:45:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00546.txt.bz2 Hi, And probably new targets for h8300h and h8300s with -mint32 specified. I have seen such combinations in some other targets. Could be useful in making changes for the simulator. Regards, Venky > -----Original Message----- > From: Kazu Hirata [mailto:kazu@cs.umass.edu] > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:55 AM > To: Andrew.Volkov@transas.com > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; crossgcc@sources.redhat.com; gnuh8@gnuh8.org.uk > Subject: Re: New targets to Binutils for H8 series > > > Hi Andrew, > > > Good idea, but I think also will be good, mark 26xx subtarget as > > new bfd-target too. > > I am basically for having a subtarget for each combination of > instruction set and mode. However, if we have .h2600 or something, > then we should probably have "upward compatibility" thing built into > the linker so that we can mix H8S/2600 code with H8S or H8/300H. This > way, we don't have to have separate libgcc.a and lib[mc].a, etc, for > H8S/2600 because the difference of instruction sets between H8S and > H8S/200 is only mac-related instructions. > > Kazu Hirata >