From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from resqmta-a2p-658919.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-a2p-658919.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fd01:2bb4::8]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E85133858D1E for ; Tue, 21 May 2024 14:02:45 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org E85133858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=comcast.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=comcast.net ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org E85133858D1E Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:558:fd01:2bb4::8 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1716300176; cv=none; b=dl+BlLArbF6Vo4v5XnCnWHV+4sX1ADxIgkLkV1cPHuIiPylARgXcrhsKTBdRjewL/mOhWJCs44x76FrzA+Oq8RIAajSwWPCOfuX/JRYko4J4nWP1Y25ASfaZgeo5IgvJjoeRolxZNJTHAIKz1YYmqRJKoilP1SkahHXK9Y748Tc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1716300176; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wZbPVBRNQzPwbUwadkhexxfXdq8RJVpTxopNR5477ko=; h=DKIM-Signature:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To; b=Y0FUtRGve5Jho6dOA5S+fygrnuPWGP8SAkghJcvmSnhV5Sh6UyI9bSljiCkHRDgAgKcKKgnlReqtPsngZZA/rCcby5iVYN3JsM7G+/68ZWsfel6TwGFB0ccAvhltoGtaobLlBP8/nNppj+GoDjrndQYVq/EaPlR703+KXDEHrJg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from resomta-a2p-630472.sys.comcast.net ([96.103.145.242]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 256/256 bits) (Client did not present a certificate) by resqmta-a2p-658919.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPS id 9MTEsKIM2wdlO9Q4gsaKFN; Tue, 21 May 2024 14:02:42 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=20190202a; t=1716300162; bh=U/rPOtWu3LybgR/WF20gbHUJsfTv6aAnO4wwWy2VyfM=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To:Xfinity-Spam-Result; b=GVeZ3wH5teZD5K6KvaysJRdHmWZMTsWkYHpZy8OyD6MZiils5REY95V5/x3U1MEhc MxBS3Turx4tAviBJArr324POIxQ1SsG2kji7xp1xTmpdMSbyQ085D4RFd9oh/gu4GP mvN2VV/ATsbmJ5uyrtwv/SiLlksGegrx4gyfMHAG5dd5brdYlzWmM1EgrqJCBou7yt 73uhyU4gJ8VeCENw8ukRfSO2PPiPU+n6afu6zHSJtwpZCrgMtHdbd4jOOemilJ9gQB CEK3EA9LefU45V51UbuAAw43DKGgN735AW89mDAvb18dZA68GIVLv8ll8wxxLXihz+ hygio54zpxSug== Received: from smtpclient.apple ([73.60.223.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 256/256 bits) (Client did not present a certificate) by resomta-a2p-630472.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPSA id 9Q4esQjsLKQHB9Q4fsJdvW; Tue, 21 May 2024 14:02:42 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.8\)) Subject: Re: [committed] PATCH for Re: Stepping down as maintainer for ARC and Epiphany From: Paul Koning In-Reply-To: <87606d95-fdc6-4d2c-849a-6dbee60dac5f@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 10:02:40 -0400 Cc: Richard Biener , Gerald Pfeifer , Joern Rennecke , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1688582633587.6.46186@webmail-backend-production-7b8b7bc877-jfhdl> <87606d95-fdc6-4d2c-849a-6dbee60dac5f@gmail.com> To: Jeff Law X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.8) X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfCCbsrtYDc+2rUE+yTQA1MjT5ioyH+QXy0u2ESz4kryA2fyLpZa6QUUIycT5YKyUau4Hrr1Vfz5pwhWC58lz3nByltPQJrWWn6s/FFnbq2veIyOzDsHu ZYZClFz4dP2I+j+p7TX0vUwCGeZvUa+B5rEyVxMXHoP9BnSrMyYtTghjzpFLfNavqLxgHjGJ/69bU3slJasLUp/5Owxig38k0bzYc5gNrahUWjzAusaJywhs 2tBur3scRmwkI5mMAHeV4/X+U43YWyO8p/43kyweQdJPrs2AnlPcABpELpOi+gtzcKkHlqmdBUn6jAKAFZlSJMFW6myFIce+nKJWImxnJ5ew0OI4Jg6HE+nh k34gW5SI X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > On May 21, 2024, at 9:57 AM, Jeff Law wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 5/21/24 12:05 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: >> On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 4:45=E2=80=AFPM Gerald Pfeifer = wrote: >>>=20 >>> On Wed, 5 Jul 2023, Joern Rennecke wrote: >>>> I haven't worked with these targets in years and can't really do >>>> sensible maintenance or reviews of patches for them. I am currently >>>> working on optimizations for other ports like RISC-V. >>>=20 >>> I noticed MAINTAINERS was not updated, so pushed the patch below. >> That leaves the epiphany port unmaintained. Should we automatically = add such >> ports to the list of obsoleted ports? > Given that epiphany has randomly failed tests for the last 3+ years = due to bugs in its patterns, yes, it really needs to be deprecated. >=20 > I tried to fix the worst of the offenders in epiphany.md a few years = back and gave up. Essentially seemingly innocent changes in the RTL = will cause reload to occasionally not see a path to get constraints = satisfied. So a test which passes today, will flip to failing tomorrow = while some other test of tests will go the other way. Does LRA make that issue go away, or does it not help? paul