From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-93886-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11163 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2004 23:39:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11156 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2004 23:39:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2004 23:39:28 -0000
Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24)
	id 1B9ujX-0006dM-HR; Sat, 03 Apr 2004 18:39:27 -0500
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
To: Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>
CC: rcs@cert.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, glibc-sc@gnu.org, drepper@gnu.org,
	cert@cert.org, eggert@twinsun.com, drepper@redhat.com
In-reply-to: <200404021859.37220.bruno@clisp.org> (message from Bruno Haible
	on Fri, 2 Apr 2004 18:59:37 +0200)
Subject: Re: VU#540517
Reply-to: rms@gnu.org
References: <200404012003.i31K3lU1019505@starsky.blue.cert.org>
	<200404021352.03482.bruno@clisp.org> <406D7F6B.8030000@cert.org> <200404021859.37220.bruno@clisp.org>
Message-Id: <E1B9ujX-0006dM-HR@fencepost.gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 23:39:00 -0000
X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00176.txt.bz2

    Btw, the impact of the bug is probably zero: I bet that on a typical Linux
    system, not a single program is compiled with -ftrapv. (Try googling for
    "+cflags +frapv". All occurrences that you find are commented out.)

You're probably right--but if we're having a discussion about the
GNU/Linux system, please let's not call it "Linux".

(See http://www.gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html for more explanation.)