From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14079 invoked by alias); 12 May 2003 13:59:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14010 invoked from network); 12 May 2003 13:59:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dberlin.org) (69.3.5.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 May 2003 13:59:06 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (account dberlin HELO dberlin.org) by dberlin.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b6) with ESMTP-TLS id 3952001; Mon, 12 May 2003 09:59:06 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 13:59:00 -0000 Subject: Re: tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) Cc: Diego Novillo , Richard Guenther , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" To: Steven Bosscher From: Daniel Berlin In-Reply-To: <1052744480.2035.40.camel@steven> Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01126.txt.bz2 On Monday, May 12, 2003, at 09:01 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote: > Op ma 12-05-2003, om 14:43 schreef Diego Novillo: >> On Sun, 2003-05-11 at 13:11, Richard Guenther wrote: >>> cc1plus: out of memory allocating 564784160 bytes after a total of >>> 28152172 bytes >>> Command exited with non-zero status 1 > > FWIW, this is not the first report of such a message showing up. I've > seen it at least twice for something involving the preprocessor. > I really can't think of _any_ situation where we would want to allocate > 564MB in one big chunk, so this really is a bug somewhere. Apparently you've never had the joy of working with some form of interference graph. :) Andrew, if this relationship is symmetric (ie a interferes with b implies b interferes with a), you can halve the size and represent it as a triangular bitmatrix like we do in new-regalloc. grep for igraph and igraph_index. > > Gr. > Steven > >