From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26293 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2001 22:30:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26272 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2001 22:30:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by hostedprojects.ges.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Nov 2001 22:30:42 -0000 Received: from DARWIN.GNAT.COM (DARWIN.GNAT.COM [205.232.38.44]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529C9F28AD; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 17:29:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 17:38:00 -0000 Subject: Re: [Ada] Q about building cross gnatlib Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v475) Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org To: guerby@acm.org From: Geert Bosch In-Reply-To: <200111302134.fAULY2c00478@ulmo.localdomain> Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.475) X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg01147.txt.bz2 On Friday, November 30, 2001, at 04:34 , wrote: > Does the ACT tree (when building for VxWorks for example) have > specific patches to the Makefile to handle the situation? If they're > not completely ready for the FSF tree yet, could someone send them to > me, it would help a lot my efforts to setup a cross testing > environment for the various RTEMS targets. (Right now I'm kluding > around > the Makefile in random places and not completely successful yet.) There are no specific patches, and we do nightly cross-builds of GNAT on for a whole set of hosts/targets. This is with the old gcc 2.8.1 setup though, so any differences should be due to the differences between the current setup and the old one (which you know well). -Geert From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Bosch To: guerby@acm.org Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [Ada] Q about building cross gnatlib Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <200111302134.fAULY2c00478@ulmo.localdomain> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg01648.html Message-ID: <20011130143000.xerkFNmv5k5kn5KoFUL0HP4vPq42UkU6LTWj4t_APE8@z> On Friday, November 30, 2001, at 04:34 , wrote: > Does the ACT tree (when building for VxWorks for example) have > specific patches to the Makefile to handle the situation? If they're > not completely ready for the FSF tree yet, could someone send them to > me, it would help a lot my efforts to setup a cross testing > environment for the various RTEMS targets. (Right now I'm kluding > around > the Makefile in random places and not completely successful yet.) There are no specific patches, and we do nightly cross-builds of GNAT on for a whole set of hosts/targets. This is with the old gcc 2.8.1 setup though, so any differences should be due to the differences between the current setup and the old one (which you know well). -Geert