From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8525 invoked by alias); 10 May 2003 16:10:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8496 invoked from network); 10 May 2003 16:10:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dellpi.pinski.fam) (216.196.136.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 May 2003 16:10:37 -0000 Received: from physics.uc.edu (IDENT:pinskia@localhost.pinski.fam [127.0.0.1]) by dellpi.pinski.fam (8.12.2/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h4AGAYMJ030907; Sat, 10 May 2003 12:10:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 16:10:00 -0000 Subject: Re: 4 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2003-05-10T10:23:38Z. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) Cc: Andrew Pinski To: gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org From: Andrew Pinski In-Reply-To: <200305101459.h4AExxCU011078@gcc-regress.apple.com> Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01010.txt.bz2 Can someone mark these as xfailures on stabs based debugging for -O3 and above. Thanks, Andrew Pinski On Saturday, May 10, 2003, at 10:59 US/Eastern, GCC regression checker wrote: > native gcc.sum gcc.dg/debug/debug-1.c > native gcc.sum gcc.dg/debug/debug-2.c