From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6631 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2002 19:48:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6624 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2002 19:48:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Oct 2002 19:48:34 -0000 Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17ydrm-0003PH-00 for gcc@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2002 15:48:34 -0400 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17ydrh-0006Ik-00 for gcc@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2002 15:48:30 -0400 Received: from [65.119.193.34] (helo=ewrelex004.na.webmd.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17ydrh-0006I9-00 for gcc@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2002 15:48:29 -0400 Received: by ewrelex004.na.webmd.net with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 15:48:20 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Valle, Adam" To: 'Robert Lipe' Cc: "'gcc@gnu.org'" Subject: RE: SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95 Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 14:05:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=EXCHANGE_SERVER,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00430.txt.bz2 Have you heard of any issues (good or bad) with any gcc versions on SCO OpenServer 5.0.2 SCO OpenServer 5.0.3, or UnixWare? Thanks, Adam -----Original Message----- From: Robert Lipe [mailto:robertlipe@usa.net] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 3:18 PM To: Valle, Adam Cc: 'gcc@gnu.org' Subject: Re: SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95 Valle, Adam wrote: > On http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.95/buildstat.html , there are two listings for > OpenServer 5.0.5 : > i386-pc-sco3.2v5.0.5 > Successful > i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.5 > Successful > > Was one of these intended for OpenServer 5.0.4? I would assume no typos. 5.0.4 is a pretty tenured release these days. The above results are telling you that it succeeded targeting either processor. GCC tickles a couple of bugs in the assembler and linker on the OS of that vintage. There was a TLS (TLS706, I think) that fixed a number of these problems. > Has there been a successfull release of gcc 2.95 on this platform? I recall the source release pretty much Just Working. There were binary kits put up on www.caldera.com/skunkware. Signed, Your Fellow Nashvillian