From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-89440-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 521 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2004 22:22:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 511 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2004 22:22:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out4.apple.com) (17.254.13.23)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2004 22:22:47 -0000
Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225])
	by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0JMMlcb017670
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:22:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id <T673aebdb2b118064e15cc@mailgate1.apple.com>;
 Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:22:47 -0800
Received: from [17.201.20.159] (keatge.apple.com [17.201.20.159])
	by relay2.apple.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0JMMVPx026498;
	Mon, 19 Jan 2004 22:22:31 GMT
In-Reply-To: <200401192304.01694.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
References: <90200277-4301-11D8-BDBD-000A95B1F520@apple.com> <200401192120.53057.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <51C2CB76-4AC7-11D8-90DA-0030657EA24A@apple.com> <200401192304.01694.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <FC0F03A8-4ACD-11D8-90DA-0030657EA24A@apple.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Scott Robert Ladd <coyote@coyotegulch.com>, Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com>,
        gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Nick Burrett <nick@dsvr.net>,
        Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>,
        Marc Espie <espie@quatramaran.ens.fr>
From: Geoff Keating <geoffk@apple.com>
Subject: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 22:22:00 -0000
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01395.txt.bz2

On Jan 19, 2004, at 2:04 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:

>> I would look at it this way: Why should a professional developer based
>> in the US try to make GCC work on anything less than this machine?
>> It's clearly not cost-effective to spend any significant time doing 
>> so.
>
> My point of view is exactly reverse :-)  Why should a developer not 
> keep GCC
> working on such a machine?

Because it's a waste of the developer's time?

-- 
Geoff Keating <geoffk@apple.com>