From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25111 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2004 03:55:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25104 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2004 03:55:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp2.fuse.net) (216.68.8.172) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2004 03:55:41 -0000 Received: from dellpi.pinski.fam ([66.42.149.169]) by smtp2.fuse.net (InterMail vM.6.00.05.02 201-2115-109-103-20031105) with ESMTP id <20040117035538.EGUW10599.smtp2.fuse.net@dellpi.pinski.fam>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 22:55:38 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (IDENT:pinskia@localhost.pinski.fam [127.0.0.1]) by dellpi.pinski.fam (8.12.2/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i0H3tRLI007401; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 22:55:29 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4008A5D1.1090400@gnat.com> References: <1074298740.3147.79.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <200401170151.i0H1pjEn020723@caip.rutgers.edu> <200401170317.10521.s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl> <4008A5D1.1090400@gnat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrew Pinski , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, "Kaveh R. Ghazi" , Gabriel Dos Reis , law@redhat.com, Steven Bosscher , gp@suse.de, dnovillo@redhat.com, jsm@polyomino.org.uk From: Andrew Pinski Subject: Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 03:55:00 -0000 To: Robert Dewar X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01019.txt.bz2 On Jan 16, 2004, at 19:02, Robert Dewar wrote: > Steven Bosscher wrote: > >> I would agree with you on principle. But nobody is willing/able to >> update g77, and for Ada, everyone knows Kenner has done some work in >> this area but it's just not there and hasn't been for four years. So >> do you think we should wait until someone cares enough to make this >> transition? > > g77 seems a real problem to me. But of course anyone interested in > Ada or Fortran can perfectly well make a branch if they want. Why would g77 be a big problem when gfortran (aka g95) exists? gfortran should (or rather will in some cases) run f77 code. Thanks, Andrew Pinski bug master