* Re: fvisibility-inlines-hidden
@ 2006-02-03 16:22 Benjamin Kosnik
2006-02-03 17:28 ` fvisibility-inlines-hidden Howard Hinnant
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Kosnik @ 2006-02-03 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hhinnant; +Cc: gcc
> Is there a document, or a discussion that someone can point me to which
> explains why fvisibility-inlines-hidden applies to member functions,
> but not non-member functions?
AFAICT, there is very little documentation for any of the visibility
stuff. There is a web page referenced as "documentation", the pointer
to which you can find in the GCC-4.0.0 release notes.
There's been a lot of discussion in bugzilla about these features, but
little else.
-benjamin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: fvisibility-inlines-hidden
2006-02-03 16:22 fvisibility-inlines-hidden Benjamin Kosnik
@ 2006-02-03 17:28 ` Howard Hinnant
2006-02-07 20:20 ` fvisibility-inlines-hidden Mark Mitchell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Howard Hinnant @ 2006-02-03 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
On Feb 3, 2006, at 11:22 AM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
>> Is there a document, or a discussion that someone can point me to
>> which
>> explains why fvisibility-inlines-hidden applies to member functions,
>> but not non-member functions?
>
> AFAICT, there is very little documentation for any of the visibility
> stuff. There is a web page referenced as "documentation", the pointer
> to which you can find in the GCC-4.0.0 release notes.
>
> There's been a lot of discussion in bugzilla about these features, but
> little else.
>
> -benjamin
Thanks Benjamin. These are the docs I can find:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-
Options.html#C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options
The two are contradictory towards the treatment of non-member inline
functions. I believe the first document is the one that correctly
describes today's behavior.
I'm unable to find a bugzilla conversation which addresses this subject.
Let me rephrase: It seems to me that fvisibility-inlines-hidden
should apply to all inline functions (both member and non-member).
Does anyone have an argument for why it should not be this way?
-Howard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: fvisibility-inlines-hidden
2006-02-03 17:28 ` fvisibility-inlines-hidden Howard Hinnant
@ 2006-02-07 20:20 ` Mark Mitchell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Mitchell @ 2006-02-07 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Howard Hinnant; +Cc: gcc
Howard Hinnant wrote:
> Let me rephrase: It seems to me that fvisibility-inlines-hidden should
> apply to all inline functions (both member and non-member). Does
> anyone have an argument for why it should not be this way?
I certainly do not.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* fvisibility-inlines-hidden
@ 2006-02-03 15:15 Howard Hinnant
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Howard Hinnant @ 2006-02-03 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Hello,
Is there a document, or a discussion that someone can point me to
which explains why fvisibility-inlines-hidden applies to member
functions, but not non-member functions?
Thanks,
Howard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-07 20:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-02-03 16:22 fvisibility-inlines-hidden Benjamin Kosnik
2006-02-03 17:28 ` fvisibility-inlines-hidden Howard Hinnant
2006-02-07 20:20 ` fvisibility-inlines-hidden Mark Mitchell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-03 15:15 fvisibility-inlines-hidden Howard Hinnant
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).