* Re: Taking too long
@ 2001-06-19 6:45 dewar
2001-06-19 13:29 ` Robert Mcnulty junior
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: dewar @ 2001-06-19 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bmj2001, neil; +Cc: gcc
>>It's way faster on my 800MHz Duron, at least 3 times...
Even this is a slow machine by today's standards.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: Taking too long
2001-06-19 6:45 Taking too long dewar
@ 2001-06-19 13:29 ` Robert Mcnulty junior
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robert Mcnulty junior @ 2001-06-19 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dewar, neil; +Cc: gcc
It's faster to compile under Linux, any way.
Before, when it was just using the branch to compile, last week, under
linux, on a Pentium running at 166 MHZ (I really do have to upgrade my
computer. Its over 5 years old),
Linux Mandrake 7.2, took 1 1/2 hours to compile. Using standard compiler
that come with it.
-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [ mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org]On Behalf Of
dewar@gnat.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:46 AM
To: bmj2001@bellsouth.net; neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Taking too long
>>It's way faster on my 800MHz Duron, at least 3 times...
Even this is a slow machine by today's standards.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: Taking too long
2001-06-18 23:28 ` Alexandre Oliva
@ 2001-06-19 9:15 ` Robert Mcnulty junior
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robert Mcnulty junior @ 2001-06-19 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexandre Oliva; +Cc: Gcc@Gcc.Gnu.Org
In other other other, Use my Linux, huh?
-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [ mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org]On Behalf Of
Alexandre Oliva
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:28 AM
To: Robert Mcnulty junior
Cc: Gcc@Gcc.Gnu.Org
Subject: Re: Taking too long
On Jun 18, 2001, "Robert Mcnulty junior" <bmj2001@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> This is taking too long on Windows 98.
> Is there any way of cutting the time in half to compile?
Use a Cygwin-targeted cross compiler to build GCC for Cygwin.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Taking too long
2001-06-18 16:32 Robert Mcnulty junior
2001-06-18 23:02 ` Neil Booth
@ 2001-06-18 23:28 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-06-19 9:15 ` Robert Mcnulty junior
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Oliva @ 2001-06-18 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Mcnulty junior; +Cc: Gcc@Gcc.Gnu.Org
On Jun 18, 2001, "Robert Mcnulty junior" <bmj2001@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> This is taking too long on Windows 98.
> Is there any way of cutting the time in half to compile?
Use a Cygwin-targeted cross compiler to build GCC for Cygwin.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Taking too long
2001-06-18 16:32 Robert Mcnulty junior
@ 2001-06-18 23:02 ` Neil Booth
2001-06-18 23:28 ` Alexandre Oliva
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Neil Booth @ 2001-06-18 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Mcnulty junior; +Cc: Gcc@Gcc.Gnu.Org
Robert Mcnulty junior wrote:-
> This is taking too long on Windows 98.
> Is there any way of cutting the time in half to compile?
> I have been at this for two-three hours, and its still on stage 2 building
> the c++ compiler
Upgrade to a dual Athlon? :-) Oh, wait, Win98 doesn't support dual
processing...
It does take that long. You don't say what processor you have, but on
a 350MHz K62, a bootstrap takes a long time for me - roughly 2.5 hrs
to finish the bootstrap, then another 2 to 3 hours for the testsuites.
Java helped a lot in adding time to this :-) I hope Ada doesn't make
it worse again.
It's way faster on my 800MHz Duron, at least 3 times...
Neil.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Taking too long
@ 2001-06-18 16:32 Robert Mcnulty junior
2001-06-18 23:02 ` Neil Booth
2001-06-18 23:28 ` Alexandre Oliva
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robert Mcnulty junior @ 2001-06-18 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gcc@Gcc.Gnu.Org
This is taking too long on Windows 98.
Is there any way of cutting the time in half to compile?
I have been at this for two-three hours, and its still on stage 2 building
the c++ compiler
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-06-19 13:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-06-19 6:45 Taking too long dewar
2001-06-19 13:29 ` Robert Mcnulty junior
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-06-18 16:32 Robert Mcnulty junior
2001-06-18 23:02 ` Neil Booth
2001-06-18 23:28 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-06-19 9:15 ` Robert Mcnulty junior
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).