RE: ACATS

["Dave Korn" <dk@artimi.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: gcc-owner On Behalf Of John R. Shannon
> Sent: 29 April 2004 13:20

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> I'm sorry, but I don't understand your reply.
> 
> On Thursday 29 April 2004 6:13 am, Dave Korn wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: gcc-owner On Behalf Of John R. Shannon
> > > Sent: 29 April 2004 13:09
> > > To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> > > Subject: ACATS
> > >
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > Could someone please point me in the right direction in
> > > chasing down undefined
> > > references to `.LC124' and `.LC93' in gnatlink? Off-hand, I
> > > don't see where
> > > the references come from.
> >
> >  --save-temps


Run your compiles with --save-temps on the command line.  That'll save the
generated assembler files.  Any label beginning ".LC" is a local label
(usually a string constant or switch..case jump table); that is, it should
be both defined and referred to in the same file.  You should be able to see
if gcc is generating the wrong label in the reference, or is forgetting to
output the label definition in front of the object it refers to, or if they
look valid but there's some accident perhaps to do with what section they
end up in that's confusing the link.


    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....