From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-95091-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9921 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2004 12:47:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9907 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2004 12:47:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM) (217.40.111.177)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2004 12:47:27 -0000
Received: from mace ([192.168.1.25]) by NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0);
	 Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:45:56 +0100
From: "Dave Korn" <dk@artimi.com>
To: <john@johnrshannon.com>,
	<gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: RE: ACATS
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:10:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <200404290619.45106.john@johnrshannon.com>
Message-ID: <NUTMEGOaq37WDRCSwXo000000b8@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Apr 2004 12:45:56.0640 (UTC) FILETIME=[EA650200:01C42DE7]
X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg01381.txt.bz2

> -----Original Message-----
> From: gcc-owner On Behalf Of John R. Shannon
> Sent: 29 April 2004 13:20

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> I'm sorry, but I don't understand your reply.
> 
> On Thursday 29 April 2004 6:13 am, Dave Korn wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: gcc-owner On Behalf Of John R. Shannon
> > > Sent: 29 April 2004 13:09
> > > To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> > > Subject: ACATS
> > >
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > Could someone please point me in the right direction in
> > > chasing down undefined
> > > references to `.LC124' and `.LC93' in gnatlink? Off-hand, I
> > > don't see where
> > > the references come from.
> >
> >  --save-temps


Run your compiles with --save-temps on the command line.  That'll save the
generated assembler files.  Any label beginning ".LC" is a local label
(usually a string constant or switch..case jump table); that is, it should
be both defined and referred to in the same file.  You should be able to see
if gcc is generating the wrong label in the reference, or is forgetting to
output the label definition in front of the object it refers to, or if they
look valid but there's some accident perhaps to do with what section they
end up in that's confusing the link.


    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....