RE: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?

["Dave Korn" <dk@artimi.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: gcc-owner On Behalf Of Dale Johannesen
> Sent: 19 November 2004 19:17
> To: Matt Austern
> Cc: gcc mailing list; Mike Stump; Dale Johannesen; Ziemowit 
> Laski; Helge Hess; GNUStep; Geoffrey Keating
> Subject: Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?
> 
> 
> On Nov 18, 2004, at 8:25 PM, Matt Austern wrote:
> 
> > Apple already pays Geoff.  Zem, Geoff, and I are all Apple 
> employees.
> >
> > This discussion should probably happen offline.  It's in Apple's 
> > interest for ObjC++ to get into mainline.  It's also in Apple's 
> > interest to make sure that there aren't any changes that 
> hurt compiler 
> > performance.  It's silly for this discussion to be happening on an 
> > international email list when most of the people 
> participating in it 
> > have offices on the same floor of the same building.
> 
> Yep.  At least it may be educating the people who have the silly idea 
> Apple is some kind of monolith....


  Apple IS a monolith, you can tell by the crowd of monkeys sitting in front
of it hitting each other with old bones!



[  No, that's not a reference to or accusation against anyone or thing in
particular.  I just like classic old SF movies.  :) ]

    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....