From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-105500-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26348 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2004 19:57:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26318 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2004 19:57:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM) (217.40.111.177)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 19 Nov 2004 19:57:19 -0000
Received: from mace ([192.168.1.25]) by NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
	 Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:56:04 +0000
From: "Dave Korn" <dk@artimi.com>
To: "'gcc mailing list'" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: RE: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:08:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <926459B3-3A5F-11D9-9965-000A95D7CD40@apple.com>
Message-ID: <NUTMEGWvqzAoa2JB1nd000000f9@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Nov 2004 19:56:04.0109 (UTC) FILETIME=[CD1D43D0:01C4CE71]
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00693.txt.bz2

> -----Original Message-----
> From: gcc-owner On Behalf Of Dale Johannesen
> Sent: 19 November 2004 19:17
> To: Matt Austern
> Cc: gcc mailing list; Mike Stump; Dale Johannesen; Ziemowit 
> Laski; Helge Hess; GNUStep; Geoffrey Keating
> Subject: Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?
> 
> 
> On Nov 18, 2004, at 8:25 PM, Matt Austern wrote:
> 
> > Apple already pays Geoff.  Zem, Geoff, and I are all Apple 
> employees.
> >
> > This discussion should probably happen offline.  It's in Apple's 
> > interest for ObjC++ to get into mainline.  It's also in Apple's 
> > interest to make sure that there aren't any changes that 
> hurt compiler 
> > performance.  It's silly for this discussion to be happening on an 
> > international email list when most of the people 
> participating in it 
> > have offices on the same floor of the same building.
> 
> Yep.  At least it may be educating the people who have the silly idea 
> Apple is some kind of monolith....


  Apple IS a monolith, you can tell by the crowd of monkeys sitting in front
of it hitting each other with old bones!



[  No, that's not a reference to or accusation against anyone or thing in
particular.  I just like classic old SF movies.  :) ]

    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....