From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13877 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2004 16:57:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13805 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2004 16:57:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM) (217.40.111.177) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 25 Nov 2004 16:57:55 -0000 Received: from mace ([192.168.1.25]) by NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:56:33 +0000 From: "Dave Korn" To: "'Richard Guenther'" , "'Daniel Berlin'" Cc: "'Giovanni Bajo'" , Subject: RE: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!) Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 17:41:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <84fc9c0004112508322116a434@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Nov 2004 16:56:33.0921 (UTC) FILETIME=[B80F7F10:01C4D30F] X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00977.txt.bz2 > -----Original Message----- > From: gcc-owner On Behalf Of Richard Guenther > Sent: 25 November 2004 16:32 > To: Daniel Berlin > Cc: Giovanni Bajo; gcc > Subject: Re: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!) > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:28:39 -0500, Daniel Berlin > wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 10:44 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > > > > > Can't we have a caused-by-patch field in bugzilla where > we could link the patch > > > causing the failure and a caused-by field with the author (and > > > automatically CC'ing > > > him)? I don't think it is a great idea overloading the > assigned-to field. > > > > Everytime you ask me to add another custom field, God kills > a kitten. > > Please, think of the kittens. > > Don't kittens have nine lifes? :) > > Richard. If I were to ask Daniel to add a field for the number of remaining kitten-lives, would it end up auto-decrementing? cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today....