From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5401 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2003 09:51:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5391 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2003 09:51:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sc2k-ntrdcss3.nsc.com) (12.151.32.16) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Oct 2003 09:51:36 -0000 Received: from 139.187.179.130 by SC2k-NTRDCSS2.nsc.com with ESMTP (-Hi- (MMS v5.5.3)); Thu, 09 Oct 2003 01:27:46 -0700 Received: from scsmtp01.nsc.com by scmh1.nsc.com with ESMTP for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 01:27:45 -0700 Subject: Re: Joining GCC for version 3.4 To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org cc: "Gali Carmel" , "Tomer Levi" Message-ID: From: "Tal Agmon" Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 11:21:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-WSS-ID: 139BC388645358-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00324.txt.bz2 Hi, If our port is completely non-intrusive, what is the last date in which there's still a chance to accept it? I didn't see dates for version 3.5 in the timeline in gcc site, can you tell me when is it planned to be released and what is the last date for us to contribute to it? In short, when is the next last date for us to offer our port? Regards, Tal. On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 02:16:39PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > It's probably too late. Of course, if the port doesn't require any > changes outside a new config/ directory then the release manager's more > likely to make an exception. We even allowed the Tensilica port into a point release, because it was completely non-intrusive (couldn't break anything else). So, as Daniel says, it depends on whether the port needs modification to the processor-independent parts of GCC.