From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-116829-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29182 invoked by alias); 5 Jul 2005 20:18:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29150 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jul 2005 20:18:25 -0000
Received: from mtagate1.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate1.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.150)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 20:18:25 +0000
Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49])
	by mtagate1.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j65KI7Fu152752
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 20:18:07 GMT
Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228])
	by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j65KI7vc146756
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 22:18:07 +0200
Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j65KI7gX012492
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 22:18:07 +0200
Received: from d12ml102.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12ml102.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.166.138])
	by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j65KI7wf012485;
	Tue, 5 Jul 2005 22:18:07 +0200
In-Reply-To: <42CAAFD4.8020500@suse.de>
Subject: Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86)
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
Message-ID: <OF1CE95ED4.6DFCB24F-ONC2257035.00688301-C2257035.006F877F@il.ibm.com>
From: Michael Veksler <VEKSLER@il.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 20:18:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00193.txt.bz2





Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> wrote on 05/07/2005 19:05:40:
>
> However, sorry, as a matter of politeness, in my opinion expressions
> like "absurdity" or "very  bad way" are much better accepted if
> accompanied by corresponding constructive contributions. Or,
> alternately, just avoid such extreme statements and offer analyses
> preferring technical terms and citations, as you basically just did,
> thanks about that.

No offense meant, it's only due to cultural differences...
I'll keep in mind to avoid such words, so that nobody is offended.
Unfortunately, the text is much more dry and boring that way.

  Michael