From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28564 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2005 07:50:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28533 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Aug 2005 07:50:02 -0000 Received: from msw.sunplus.com.tw (HELO msw.sunplus.com.tw) (211.72.231.146) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 07:50:02 +0000 Received: from maillog.sunplus.com.tw (unverified [172.17.10.158]) by msw.sunplus.com.tw (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.19) with ESMTP id ; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 15:49:34 +0800 Received: from smtp.sunplus.com.tw (smtp.sunplus.com.tw [172.17.10.200]) by maillog.sunplus.com.tw (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j727t03M031701; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 15:55:01 +0800 To: Joern RENNECKE Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Ian@st.com, ibanez@sunplus.com, Lance@st.com, Taylor@st.com From: ibanez@sunplus.com Subject: Re: does the instruction combiner regards (foo & 0xff) as a special case? MIME-Version: 1.0 Sensitivity: Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 07:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2 You are cool, now I found a (set (reg:CC_Z 33 cc) (compare:CC_Z (zero_extend:SI (subreg:QI (reg/v:SI 166 [ a ]) 0)) (const_int 0 [0x0]))) It's what I'm looking for. Thank you so much.